On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 07:21:30PM -0800, David Stevens wrote:
> > >Marking the master down would, I believe, issue notifiers that
> > > the device has gone down. Various things, network manager sort of
> > > applications in particular, listen to those, so I'm not sure it's a
> good
> > > id
> >Marking the master down would, I believe, issue notifiers that
> > the device has gone down. Various things, network manager sort of
> > applications in particular, listen to those, so I'm not sure it's a
good
> > idea. I think there are other side effects as well, I'm thinking it
> > wo
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 03:15:41PM -0800, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
>
> David Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >It looks to me like "rejoin" is essentially ip_mc_up(), and it'd be better
> >to call that than add a nearly identical function.
>
> Won't ip_mc_up() acquire an additional refere
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/06/2007 03:15:41 PM:
>
> David Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >It looks to me like "rejoin" is essentially ip_mc_up(), and it'd be
better
> >to call that than add a nearly identical function.
>
>Won't ip_mc_up() acquire an additional reference (via
> i
David Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It looks to me like "rejoin" is essentially ip_mc_up(), and it'd be better
>to call that than add a nearly identical function.
Won't ip_mc_up() acquire an additional reference (via
ip_mc_inc_group) to the IGMP_ALL_HOSTS im->users that would never
