On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 08:10:26PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The Coverity checker spotted this inconsequent NULL checking
> (unconditionally dereferencing directly after checking for NULL
> isn't a good idea).
Thanks! Added to my queue for wireless-2.6.
--
Jouni Malinen
The Coverity checker spotted this inconsequent NULL checking
(unconditionally dereferencing directly after checking for NULL
isn't a good idea).
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.16-rc5-mm3-full/drivers/net/wireless/hostap/hostap_ap.c.old
2006-03-10 19:30:08.00