From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 10:43:40 +1000
> I've finally found a potential cause of the sk_forward_alloc underflows
> that people have been reporting sporadically.
>
> When tcp_sendmsg tacks on extra bits to an existing TCP_PAGE we don't
> check sk_forward_alloc ev
Hi:
I've finally found a potential cause of the sk_forward_alloc underflows
that people have been reporting sporadically.
When tcp_sendmsg tacks on extra bits to an existing TCP_PAGE we don't
check sk_forward_alloc even though a large amount of time may have
elapsed since we allocated the page.