On 10/02/2019 12:44, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 10.02.2019 10:16, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> On 09/02/2019 12:50, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>> On 09.02.2019 11:07, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>>> On 09/02/2019 10:59, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>>>>
On 10/02/2019 14:50, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> This reverts commit 2e6eedb4813e34d8d84ac0eb3afb668966f3f356.
>
> Sander reported a regression [1], therefore let's revert these commits.
> Removal of the barriers doesn't seem to contribute to the issue, the
> patch just overlaps with the problematic
On 10/02/2019 12:44, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 10.02.2019 10:16, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> On 09/02/2019 12:50, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>> On 09.02.2019 11:07, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>>> On 09/02/2019 10:59, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>>>>
On 09/02/2019 12:50, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 09.02.2019 11:07, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> On 09/02/2019 10:59, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>> On 09.02.2019 10:34, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>>> On 09/02/2019 10:02, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>>>
On 09/02/2019 10:59, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 09.02.2019 10:34, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> On 09/02/2019 10:02, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>> On 09.02.2019 00:09, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 02/08/2019 01:50 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrot
On 09/02/2019 10:02, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 09.02.2019 00:09, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 02/08/2019 01:50 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>> On 08.02.2019 22:45, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>>> On 08/02/2019 22:22, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>&
On 08/02/2019 22:50, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 08.02.2019 22:45, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> On 08/02/2019 22:22, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>> On 08.02.2019 21:55, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>>> On 08/02/2019 19:52, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>>>>
On 08/02/2019 22:22, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 08.02.2019 21:55, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> On 08/02/2019 19:52, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>> On 08.02.2019 19:29, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>>> L.S.,
>>>>
>>>> While testing a linux 5.0-rc5
On 08/02/2019 19:52, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 08.02.2019 19:29, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> L.S.,
>>
>> While testing a linux 5.0-rc5 kernel (with some patches on top but they
>> don't seem related) under Xen i the nasty splat below,
>> that
L.S.,
While testing a linux 5.0-rc5 kernel (with some patches on top but they don't
seem related) under Xen i the nasty splat below,
that I haven encountered with Linux 4.20.x.
Unfortunately I haven't got a clear reproducer for this and bisecting could be
nasty due to another (networking relat
On 08/02/2019 12:54, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Florian Westphal wrote:
>> Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>> L.S.,
>>>
>>> While trying out a 5.0-RC5 kernel I seem to have stumbled over a regression
>>> with NAT.
>>> (using
L.S.,
While trying out a 5.0-RC5 kernel I seem to have stumbled over a regression
with NAT.
(using an nftables firewall with NAT and connection tracking).
Unfortunately it isn't too obvious since no errors are logged, but on clients it
causes symptoms like firefox intermittently not being able t
L.S.,
While testing a linux 4.14-rc6 kernel i noticed OpenVPN didn't function
anymore.
My openvpn config uses tun devices and is pretty standard.
The openvpn version is current Debian stable: openvpn 2.4.0-6+deb9u2
>From the openvpn logging:
Sat Oct 28 16:03:34 2017 us=175829 TUN/TAP device
On 22/05/17 23:02, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>
>
> On 22-5-2017 14:09, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>> On 5/22/2017 12:57 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 12:36 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I encounte
Hi,
I encountered this splat with 4.12-RC2.
--
Sander
[ 119.021594] BUG: scheduling while atomic: irq/47-iwlwifi/517/0x0200
[ 119.021604] Modules linked in: xt_tcpudp ip6t_rpfilter ipt_REJECT
nf_reject_ipv4 ip6t_REJECT nf_reject_ipv6 nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6
xt_conntrack ip_set n
On 2015-12-30 03:39, ebied...@xmission.com wrote:
Pablo Neira Ayuso writes:
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 09:05:03PM +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
Hi,
Running a 4.4.0-rc6 kernel i encountered the warning below.
Cc'ing Eric Biederman.
@Sander, could you provide a way to reproduce this
Hi,
Running a 4.4.0-rc6 kernel i encountered the warning below.
--
Sander
[ 13.740472] ip_tables: (C) 2000-2006 Netfilter Core Team
[ 13.936237] iwlwifi :03:00.0: L1 Enabled - LTR Disabled
[ 13.945391] iwlwifi :03:00.0: L1 Enabled - LTR Disabled
[ 13.947434] iwlwifi :03:00
On 2015-11-13 13:43, Ido Schimmel wrote:
Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 02:34:45PM IST, li...@eikelenboom.it wrote:
On 2015-11-13 12:06, Ido Schimmel wrote:
When NET_SWITCHDEV=n, switchdev_port_attr_set simply returns
EOPNOTSUPP.
In this case we should not emit errors and warnings to the kernel
log.
H
vif-19-0 vif19.0: set_features() failed (-1); wanted
0x00044803, left 0x000400114813
[ 335.615401] xen_bridge: set_features() failed (-1); wanted
0x00801fdb78c9, left 0x00801fff78e9
--
Sander
Reported-by: Sander Eikelenboom
Fixes: 0bc05d585d38 ("switchdev: allow c
On 2015-11-12 17:52, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 16:16 +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Thanks for the report, please try following patch :
Hi Eric,
Thanks for the patch!
Got it up and running at the moment, but since i don't have a clear
trigger it
will take 1 o
On 2015-11-12 15:09, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 11:08 +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
Hi All,
Just got a crash with a linux-4.4-mw kernel.
I'm using a routed bridge and apart from the splat below i have got
some
interesting other messages that aren't there in 4.3 (a
Hi All,
Just got a crash with a linux-4.4-mw kernel.
I'm using a routed bridge and apart from the splat below i have got some
interesting other messages that aren't there in 4.3 (and perhaps are of
interest for the crash as well):
[ 207.033768] vif vif-1-0 vif1.0: set_features() failed (-1); w
On 2015-09-13 20:06, Florian Westphal wrote:
Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
Using a linux-4.3-rc1 kernel i encountered the splat below:
Thanks for reporting this bug.
[ 290.200642] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at
0484195d
[ 290.211702] IP: [] physdev_mt+0xd6/0x160
Using a linux-4.3-rc1 kernel i encountered the splat below:
addr2line gives:
/usr/src/new/linux-linus/include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h:350
which is:
/*
* This helper is performance critical and must be inlined
*/
static inline unsigned long ifname_compare_aligned(const char *_a,
On 2015-08-17 19:18, Eric Dumazet wrote:
From: Eric Dumazet
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 16:25 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
Monday, August 17, 2015, 4:21:47 PM, you wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 09:02 -0500, Jon Christopherson wrote:
>> This is very similar to the behavior I am seein
Monday, August 17, 2015, 4:21:47 PM, you wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 09:02 -0500, Jon Christopherson wrote:
>> This is very similar to the behavior I am seeing in this bug:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102911
> OK, but have you applied the fix ?
> http://git.kernel.org/
Monday, August 17, 2015, 3:37:13 PM, you wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 11:09 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> Saturday, August 15, 2015, 12:39:25 AM, you wrote:
>>
>> > On Sat, 2015-08-15 at 00:09 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> >> On 2015-08-13 00:41
Saturday, August 15, 2015, 12:39:25 AM, you wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-08-15 at 00:09 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> On 2015-08-13 00:41, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 23:46 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> >
>> >> Thanks for the re
On 2015-08-15 00:09, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
On 2015-08-13 00:41, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 23:46 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
Thanks for the reminder, but luckily i was aware of that,
seen enough of your replies asking for patches to be resubmitted
against "the
On 2015-08-13 00:41, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 23:46 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
Thanks for the reminder, but luckily i was aware of that,
seen enough of your replies asking for patches to be resubmitted
against "the other tree" ;)
Kernel with patch is currently
On 2015-08-12 23:40, David Miller wrote:
From: li...@eikelenboom.it
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:50:42 +0200
On 2015-08-12 22:41, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 21:19 +0200, li...@eikelenboom.it wrote:
Hi,
On my box running Xen with a 4.2-rc6 kernel i still get this splat
in
dom0,
w
31 matches
Mail list logo
