tipc/vtipc.c| 154
+++
net/tipc/vtipc.h| 48 ++
tools/tipc-config.c | 29 ++--
Even though I *don't* want the attached patch to be integrated
into the kernel (yet), I'm still going to include:
Signed-off
Rick Jones wrote:
Majumder, Rajib wrote:
Let's say we have 2 uniprocessor hosts connected back to back. Is
there any possibility of an out-of-order scenario on recv?
Your application should be written on the assumption that it is
possible, regardless of the specifics of the hosts involved, h
In a different thred,
Jon Paul Maloy wrote:
> One (TIPC user) I know about,who has developed a very interesting
> "reliable bond interface" based on this API, doesn't regard his code
> to be up to the kernel coding standards yet, although I am trying to
> encourage him.
Sounds interesting! C
