On 30/03/07, Rick Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If the switchover from active to standby is "commanded" then there is
the opportunity to "tell" the applications on the server to close their
connections - either explicitly with some sort of defined interface, or
implicitly by killing the proces
On 30/03/07, Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Predrag Hodoba wrote:
> On 30/03/07, Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> David Miller wrote:
>> >
>> > Something being in the CGL specification is to me exactly a great
>> > reas
On 30/03/07, Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David Miller wrote:
>
> Something being in the CGL specification is to me exactly a great
> reason NOT to add it. That specification is so full of garbage it's
> unbelievable.
>
> Thanks, you've given me one more reason not to even remote
recover in matter of seconds instead of minutes. Obviously, if
one envisages failover of any kind of service, then you can't control what
socket options are used by someone.
Cheers,
Predrag Hodoba
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a
