her people who stumbled across this quirk. At the very
least, it should be clearly documented, where a sysadmin setting up
multicast streaming would find it.
--
Pierre Ynard
For hire - http://www.linkfanel.net/resume.pdf
"Une â
t; corresponding RDNSS daemon and would be totally ready to
> > handle this change :)
>
> Was it an interface added to 2.6.24?
Yes.
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6.git;a=commit;h=31910
handle this change :)
--
Pierre Ynard
_
Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the
Userland neighbor discovery options are typically heavily involved with
the interface on which thay are received: add a missing ifindex field to
the original struct. Thanks to Rémi Denis-Courmont.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Ynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/include/linux/rtnetlink.h b/i
yer involved, this seems like a feature bug. Could an ifindex
> field be added there??
Ok, I am seeing to this.
--
Pierre Ynard
For hire in Quebec City, Canada, during Fall 2007
"Une âme dans un corps, c'est comme un dessin sur une feuille de papier."
-
To unsubscribe from this li
defined, if needed by new use cases.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Ynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/include/linux/rtnetlink.h b/include/linux/rtnetlink.h
index dff3192..124d451 100644
--- a/include/linux/rtnetlink.h
+++ b/include/linux/rtnetlink.h
@@ -97,6 +97,9 @@ enum {
RTM_SETNEIGHTBL,
#
This patch fixes a few typos in comments in include/net/netlink.h
Signed-off-by: Pierre Ynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/include/net/netlink.h b/include/net/netlink.h
index 83113df..1afd3e8 100644
--- a/include/net/netlink.h
+++ b/include/net/netlink.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@
* nla_ne
a 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
@@ -15,9 +15,10 @@
/*
* Changes:
*
+ * Pierre Ynard: export userland ND options
+ * through netlink (RDNSS support)
* Lars Fenneberg :
he work to userland. Couldn't it be?
After all, the fact that RDNSS be accepted as an RA option is an
argument to say that it belongs in the kernel, not as DNS, but as an RA
option. As you are saying to Rémi, your intent is to fix or enhance the
existing, generic means of the kernel to provide
he difference, for me.
>
> I totally agree with David, this stuff definitely does not belong
> in the kernel.
It is my understanding that you think that IP stack configuration
belongs in the kernel whereas DNS does not, right?
Then I have a question: does RS-RA management belong in the kerne
on't bother CCing me, I'm on the list.)
Regards,
--
Pierre Ynard
WTS #51 - No phone
"Une âme dans un corps, c'est comme un dessin sur une feuille de papier."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMA
.data = &ip_rt_mc_src_strict,
+ .maxlen = sizeof(int),
+ .mode = 0644,
+ .proc_handler = &ipv4_doint_and_f
.data = &ip_rt_mc_src_strict,
+ .maxlen = sizeof(int),
+ .mode = 0644,
+ .proc_handler = &ipv4_doint_and_flush,
+ .strategy = &ipv4_doint_and_f
13 matches
Mail list logo
