RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [5.10] i40e/udp_tunnel: RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv4/udp_tunnel_nic.c

2021-02-08 Thread Pierre Cheynier
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 18:08:31 +0100 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > Yup! I'm pretty sure it's my conversion. The full commit quote upstream: > > 40a98cb6f01f ("i40e: convert to new udp_tunnel infrastructure") > > It should trigger if you have vxlan module loaded (or built in) > and then reload or re-probe

RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [5.10] i40e/udp_tunnel: RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv4/udp_tunnel_nic.c

2021-02-03 Thread Pierre Cheynier
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 16:25:12 +0100 Pierre Cheynier wrote: > On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 15:23:54 +0100 Sokolowski, Jan wrote: > > > It has been mentioned that the error only appeared recently, after upgrade > > to 5.10.X. What's the last known working configuration it was test

RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [5.10] i40e/udp_tunnel: RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv4/udp_tunnel_nic.c

2021-02-03 Thread Pierre Cheynier
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 15:23:54 +0100 Sokolowski, Jan wrote: > It has been mentioned that the error only appeared recently, after upgrade to > 5.10.X. What's the last known working configuration it was tested on? A > bisection could help us investigate. I unfortunately moved from one LTS to anothe

RE: [5.10] i40e/udp_tunnel: RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv4/udp_tunnel_nic.c

2021-02-02 Thread Pierre Cheynier
On Sat, 30 Jan 2021 04:27:00 +0100 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > I must have missed that i40e_setup_pf_switch() is called from the probe > path. Do you want me to apply these patches, rebuild and tell you what's the outcome? -- Pierre

[5.10] i40e/udp_tunnel: RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv4/udp_tunnel_nic.c

2021-01-29 Thread Pierre Cheynier
080568] worker_thread+0x1dc/0x3a0 [9.084322] ? process_one_work+0x350/0x350 [9.088510] kthread+0xfe/0x140 [9.088513] ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90 [9.088516] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [9.088522] ---[ end trace daa573e87ec91564 ]--- Cheers, -- Pierre Cheynier