Iustin Pop wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 07:03:44PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Aug 12 2007 09:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
now, I am not an expert on either option, but three are a couple things that I
would question about the DRDB+MD option
1. when the remote machine is down, how does M
Denis Cheng wrote:
this memcpy looks so strange, in fact it's merely a pointer dereference,
so I change the parameter's type to refer it more directly,
this could make the memcpy not needed anymore.
in the function nbd_read_stat where nbd_find_request is only once called,
the parameter served sh
Denis Cheng wrote:
Thus the traverse of the loop may delete nodes, use the safe version.
Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/block/nbd.c |6 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c
index c129510..
