Vlad Yasevich wrote:
Paolo Galtieri wrote:
Vlad,
what test suite exists for SCTP? The lksctp-tools code hasn't been
updated since Feb of 2006, and I was wondering whether this version is
still the most useful.
Thanks
Hi Paolo
I have a lksctp-tools tree on git.kernel.org that
Vlad,
what test suite exists for SCTP? The lksctp-tools code hasn't been
updated since Feb of 2006, and I was wondering whether this version is
still the most useful.
Thanks
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
Oops, the patch I sent previously was for an older 2.6 kernel. I'm
testing on a 2.6.10+ SCTP patches up to 2.6.17. Here is a revised patch
for 2.6.21:
Paolo
Signed-off-by: Paolo Galtieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.21/net/sctp/socket.c 2007-03-26 06:58:14.
Here's the revises patch
Paolo
Signed-off-by: Paolo Galtieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- net/sctp/socket.c.orig 2007-04-05 12:59:15.0 -0700
+++ net/sctp/socket.c 2007-04-05 13:11:37.0 -0700
@@ -627,6 +627,12 @@ int sctp_bindx_rem(struct soc
Folks,
while doing some testing of SCTP recently I came across a scenario
where the behavior I see is not what I expect. Here is the scenario:
I have 2 interfaces on a system, each has both an IPv4 and an IPv6
address, e.g.
eth0
192.168.1.130
:::192.168.1.130
eth1
192.168.3.130
::
