RE: [PATCH 2/2] phylib: add module owner to the mii_bus structure

2007-12-21 Thread Medve Emilian
Tested-by: Emil Medve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nicu Ioan Petru > Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 7:58 AM > To: netdev@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Nicu Ioan Petru > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] phylib: add module owner t

RE: [PATCH 1/2] ucc_geth: split ucc_geth into two modules

2007-12-21 Thread Medve Emilian
Tested-by: Emil Medve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nicu Ioan Petru > Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 7:57 AM > To: netdev@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Nicu Ioan Petru > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ucc_geth: split ucc_geth i

RE: [PATCH] [POWERPC] ucc_geth: Eliminate compile warnings

2007-10-22 Thread Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1
Hello David, > No piece of code in the kernel should live in a vacuum. > > In order to improve overall code quality, every piece of > driver code should avoid assuming things about pointer > sizes and things of this nature. I'm afraid we might be talking about orthogonal issues here. I actively

RE: [PATCH] [POWERPC] ucc_geth: Eliminate compile warnings

2007-10-19 Thread Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1
Hello David > It only kills the warning on 32-bit systems, the cast is wrong > either way. I'm not aware of the QE being present on any 64-bit PowerPC. However, porting the entire driver to a 64-bit platform is an exercise in itself as many other things would need tweaking the QE hardware itself

RE: [PATCH v3] Make the pr_*() family of macros in kernel.h complete

2007-09-14 Thread Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1
uite sure what to do... Cheers, Emil. > -Original Message- > From: Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1 > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 11:40 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; netdev@vger.kernel.org; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1 > Subject: [P

RE: [PATCH v3] Make the pr_*() family of macros in kernel.hcomplete

2007-09-13 Thread Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1
Hello Joe, > I expect all the kernel logging functions to be > overhauled eventually. > > I'd prefer a mechanism that somehow supports > identifying complete messages. I think the new > pr_ functions are not particularly useful > without a mechanism to avoid or identify multiple > processors or

RE: [PATCH v3] Make the pr_*() family of macros in kernel.h complete

2007-09-12 Thread Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1
> -Original Message- > From: Jan Engelhardt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 1:04 PM > To: Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1 > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; netdev@vger.kernel.org; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Make

RE: [PATCH v2] Move the definition of pr_err() into kernel.h

2007-09-11 Thread Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1
> -Original Message- > From: Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 2:48 PM > To: Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > netdev@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] M