Re: [PATCH net-next] bonding: correct rr balancing during link failure

2020-12-15 Thread Lars Everbrand
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 01:46:09PM -0800, Jay Vosburgh wrote: > > Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > >On Wed, 02 Dec 2020 20:55:57 + Lars Everbrand wrote: > Are these bandwidth numbers from observation of the actual > behavior? I'm not sure the real system

Re: [PATCH net-next] bonding: correct rr balancing during link failure

2020-12-15 Thread Lars Everbrand
On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 11:45:13AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > Thanks for the patch! Kind words for my first attempt at this. Sorry for answering a bit late, proton-bridge is not my best friend lately. > > Looking at the code in question it feels a little like we're breaking > abstractions if w

[PATCH net-next] bonding: correct rr balancing during link failure

2020-12-02 Thread Lars Everbrand
33 + 0 + 0 + 100 + 33 + 33). Signed-off-by: Lars Everbrand --- drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c index e0880a3840d7..e02d9c6d40ee 100644 --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c +++ b/d