Re: [PATCH v3] kvmalloc: always use vmalloc if CONFIG_DEBUG_SG

2018-05-14 Thread Joonsoo Kim
Hello, Mikulas. On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 02:41:47PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > > On Tue, 24 Apr 2018, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 08:29:14AM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 23 Apr 2018, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 23,

Re: ACPI issues on cold power on [bisected]

2018-01-02 Thread Joonsoo Kim
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 11:25:01AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 3:54 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 04:36:59PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:21:09AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > >> >

Re: ACPI issues on cold power on [bisected]

2018-01-01 Thread Joonsoo Kim
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 04:36:59PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:21:09AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 03:11:59PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > > > I've been sitting on this for a while and should have spent ti

Re: [MM PATCH V4 6/6] slub: optimize bulk slowpath free by detached freelist

2015-11-04 Thread Joonsoo Kim
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 09:57:09AM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:15:25 +0900 > Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 05:48:26PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > > > This change focus on improving the speed of object freein

Re: [MM PATCH V4 6/6] slub: optimize bulk slowpath free by detached freelist

2015-10-13 Thread Joonsoo Kim
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 05:48:26PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > This change focus on improving the speed of object freeing in the > "slowpath" of kmem_cache_free_bulk. > > The calls slab_free (fastpath) and __slab_free (slowpath) have been > extended with support for bulk free, which amo

Re: [PATCH 7/7] slub: initial bulk free implementation

2015-06-16 Thread Joonsoo Kim
2015-06-16 17:57 GMT+09:00 Jesper Dangaard Brouer : > On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 10:21:10 +0200 > Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > >> >> On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 16:28:06 +0900 Joonsoo Kim >> wrote: >> >> > Is this really better than just calling __kmem_cache_free_

Re: [PATCH 7/7] slub: initial bulk free implementation

2015-06-16 Thread Joonsoo Kim
2015-06-16 18:20 GMT+09:00 Jesper Dangaard Brouer : > On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 16:23:28 +0900 > Joonsoo Kim wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 05:52:56PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: >> > This implements SLUB specific kmem_cache_free_bulk(). SLUB allocator >>

Re: [PATCH 7/7] slub: initial bulk free implementation

2015-06-16 Thread Joonsoo Kim
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 05:52:56PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > This implements SLUB specific kmem_cache_free_bulk(). SLUB allocator > now both have bulk alloc and free implemented. > > Play nice and reenable local IRQs while calling slowpath. > > Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer

Re: [PATCH 7/7] slub: initial bulk free implementation

2015-06-16 Thread Joonsoo Kim
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 05:52:56PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > This implements SLUB specific kmem_cache_free_bulk(). SLUB allocator > now both have bulk alloc and free implemented. > > Play nice and reenable local IRQs while calling slowpath. > > Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer

Re: [PATCH 2/7] slub bulk alloc: extract objects from the per cpu slab

2015-06-16 Thread Joonsoo Kim
Christoph Lameter > Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer > Cc: Pekka Enberg > Cc: David Rientjes > Cc: Joonsoo Kim > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton > --- > mm/slub.c | 27 ++- > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/m