Hi Stephen,
We have been working on slow start and we have a nice solution for this. We
will send you a patch and test results.
Thanks
Injong
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Hemminger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Injong Rhee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; &qu
Oops. I thought Bill was using 2.6.20 instead of 2.6.22 which should contain
our latest update.
Regarding slow start behavior, the latest version should not change though.
I think it would be ok to change the slow start of bic and cubic to the
default slow start. But what we observed is that w
On Feb 13, 2007, at 4:56 AM, Baruch Even wrote:
According to claims of Doug Leith the cubic algorithm that is in the
kernel is different from what was proposed and tested. That's an
important issue which is deflected by personal attacks.
It is not the algorithm "untested" -- it is the implem
Not sure why the slow start for cubic is slower than the others.
We will check on this.
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Hemminger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Douglas Leith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Sangtae Ha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 2:02 PM
Subject: TC
http://netsrv.csc.ncsu.edu/convex-ordering/
If you need our report on theoretical results, we can e-mail you the
report.
Injong Rhee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Douglas Leith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; ;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Injong Rhee"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 7:20 PM
Subject:
confirmed inthe FAST journal paper [
http://netlab.caltech.edu/publications/FAST-ToN-final-060209-2007.pdf --
please look at Section IV.B and C. But your results show really bad RTT
fairness.]
Best regards,
Injong
---
Injong Rhee
NCSU
On Sep 22, 2006, at 10:22 AM, Douglas Leith wrote:
For thos
Daniele,
Which version of linux are you testing with? We have test results of
linux high speed TCP options in
http://www.csc.ncsu.edu/faculty/rhee/export/bitcp/asteppaper.htm
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:netdev-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniele Lacamera
Ditto. I remember we had some discussion on this sometime back in the
netdev mailing list (Baruch was part of the discussion).
> -Original Message-
> From: David S. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 4:09 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
I wonder the same. I wonder how this new patch by the HTCP folks
improves what we provided for the 2.6.x (which is currently
incorporated in the latest linux version). My recollection says that
this HTCP patch periodically crashes the system very often -- so we
could not run the comparison. BTW, th
10 matches
Mail list logo
