> Where would that tag list be stored if you want to remove the
> 40 bytes of ->cb?
I apologize if I wasn't clear, the tag list would go in a new
skb->tags field replacing the existsing skb->cb array, so the skb
would lose 40-sizeof(void*) bytes wich seems reasonable to me.
> Linux 2.0 did someth
Hi,
I just read David S. Miller's skb redundancy page and in it he seems to suggest
taking an approach similar to that of BSD's mbufs to reduce the skb's
size. I was going to do some janitor work on the network stack and I
thought that maybe I could start by adding a tag list to the skb
similar to
