Re: Fwd: Problem with r8169 module

2020-11-02 Thread Gilberto Nunes
rmware and copied this missed firmware but no change! W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/rtl_nic/rtl8125b-2.fw for module r8169 --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira Em seg., 2 de nov. de 2020 às 10:40, Heiner Kallweit escreveu: > > On 02.11.2020 14:20, Gilberto Nunes wrote: > >

Re: Fwd: Problem with r8169 module

2020-11-02 Thread Gilberto Nunes
://pastebin.pl/view/c07f6c22 --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira Em seg., 2 de nov. de 2020 às 05:14, Heiner Kallweit escreveu: > > On 02.11.2020 04:36, Gilberto Nunes wrote: > > Hi there > > > > I am in trouble when using newer kernels than 5.4.x regarding Realtek NIC > &

Fwd: Problem with r8169 module

2020-11-01 Thread Gilberto Nunes
enp1s0f1: Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full - flow control rx/tx Cable is ok! I double check it --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira

SO_REUSEADDR semantics and bind conflicts

2018-01-24 Thread Gilberto Bertin
nd the exact desired semantics of SO_REUSEADDR with regard to bind conflicts. Thanks, gilberto

[net-next RFC 0/4] SO_BINDTOPREFIX

2016-03-29 Thread Gilberto Bertin
me prefix. Any questions/feedback appreciated. Thanks, Gilberto Gilberto Bertin (4): bindtoprefix: infrastructure bindtoprefix: TCP/IPv4 implementation bindtoprefix: TCP/IPv6 implementation bindtoprefix: UPD implementation include/net/sock.h| 20 +++ include/uapi/a

[net-next RFC 3/4] bindtoprefix: TCP/IPv6 implementation

2016-03-29 Thread Gilberto Bertin
Signed-off-by: Gilberto Bertin --- net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c | 17 - net/ipv6/inet6_hashtables.c | 6 ++ 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c index 36c3f01..c65023f

[net-next RFC 4/4] bindtoprefix: UPD implementation

2016-03-29 Thread Gilberto Bertin
Signed-off-by: Gilberto Bertin --- net/ipv4/udp.c | 36 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c index 95d2f19..31b9687 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c @@ -133,6 +133,23 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL

[net-next RFC 1/4] bindtoprefix: infrastructure

2016-03-29 Thread Gilberto Bertin
Signed-off-by: Gilberto Bertin --- include/net/sock.h| 20 +++ include/uapi/asm-generic/socket.h | 1 + net/core/sock.c | 111 ++ 3 files changed, 132 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h

[net-next RFC 2/4] bindtoprefix: TCP/IPv4 implementation

2016-03-29 Thread Gilberto Bertin
Signed-off-by: Gilberto Bertin --- net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 20 +++- net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c | 9 + 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c index 6414891..162c252

Re: [net-next RFC 0/4] SO_BINDTOSUBNET

2016-03-25 Thread Gilberto
On 03/25/2016 12:25 AM, Tom Herbert wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 6:19 AM, Gilberto Bertin > wrote: >> This is my second attempt to submit an RFC for this patch. >> >> Some arguments for and against it since the first submission: >> * SO_BINDTOSUBNET is an arbitr

[net-next RFC 2/4] bindtosubnet: TCP/IPv4 implementation

2016-03-19 Thread Gilberto Bertin
Signed-off-by: Gilberto Bertin --- net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 20 +++- net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c | 9 + 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c index 6414891..0a3777c

[net-next RFC 0/4] SO_BINDTOSUBNET

2016-03-19 Thread Gilberto Bertin
ses masked with the shortest of their prefix are equal. The bindtosubnet option can be combined with soreuseport so that two listener can bind on the same subnet. Any questions/feedback appreciated. Thanks, Gilberto Gilberto Bertin (4): bindtosubnet: infrastructure bindtosubnet: TCP/IPv4

[net-next RFC 3/4] bindtosubnet: TCP/IPv6 implementation

2016-03-19 Thread Gilberto Bertin
Signed-off-by: Gilberto Bertin --- net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c | 17 - net/ipv6/inet6_hashtables.c | 6 ++ 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c index 36c3f01..288bab6

[net-next RFC 1/4] bindtosubnet: infrastructure

2016-03-19 Thread Gilberto Bertin
Signed-off-by: Gilberto Bertin --- include/net/sock.h| 20 +++ include/uapi/asm-generic/socket.h | 1 + net/core/sock.c | 111 ++ 3 files changed, 132 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h

[net-next RFC 4/4] bindtosubnet: UPD implementation

2016-03-19 Thread Gilberto Bertin
Signed-off-by: Gilberto Bertin --- net/ipv4/udp.c | 36 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c index 95d2f19..1ecffa8 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c @@ -133,6 +133,23 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL

Re: [net-next RFC 0/4] SO_BINDTOSUBNET

2016-03-11 Thread Gilberto Bertin
next window will open for the 4.6 release, so that we can gather more comments and decide what to do. Thank you, Gilberto

Re: [net-next RFC 0/4] SO_BINDTOSUBNET

2016-03-07 Thread Gilberto Bertin
> On 24 Feb 2016, at 05:06, Tom Herbert wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Gilberto Bertin > wrote: >> This series introduces support for the SO_BINDTOSUBNET socket option, which >> allows a listener socket to bind to a subnet instead of * or a single >&

Re: [net-next RFC 0/4] SO_BINDTOSUBNET

2016-02-25 Thread Gilberto Bertin
> On 24 Feb 2016, at 05:06, Tom Herbert wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Gilberto Bertin > wrote: >> This series introduces support for the SO_BINDTOSUBNET socket option, which >> allows a listener socket to bind to a subnet instead of * or a single >&

[net-next RFC 4/4] bindtosubnet: UPD implementation

2016-02-23 Thread Gilberto Bertin
Signed-off-by: Gilberto Bertin --- net/ipv4/udp.c | 35 +++ 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c index c438908..0e78fc4 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c @@ -132,6 +132,22 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL

[net-next RFC 1/4] bindtosubnet: infrastructure

2016-02-23 Thread Gilberto Bertin
Signed-off-by: Gilberto Bertin --- include/net/sock.h| 20 +++ include/uapi/asm-generic/socket.h | 1 + net/core/sock.c | 111 ++ 3 files changed, 132 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h

[net-next RFC 3/4] bindtosubnet: TCP/IPv6 implementation

2016-02-23 Thread Gilberto Bertin
Signed-off-by: Gilberto Bertin --- net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c | 17 - net/ipv6/inet6_hashtables.c | 6 ++ 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c index a7ca2cd..b781a13

[net-next RFC 0/4] SO_BINDTOSUBNET

2016-02-23 Thread Gilberto Bertin
equal. The bindtosubnet option can be combined with soreuseport so that two listener can bind on the same subnet. Any questions/feedback appreciated. Thanks, Gilberto Gilberto Bertin (4): bindtosubnet: infrastructure bindtosubnet: TCP/IPv4 implementation bindtosubnet: TCP/IPv6 impl

[net-next RFC 2/4] bindtosubnet: TCP/IPv4 implementation

2016-02-23 Thread Gilberto Bertin
Signed-off-by: Gilberto Bertin --- net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 20 +++- net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c | 9 + 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c index 46b9c88..b182ec6

Re: [BUG] Any-IP IPv6 support broken

2015-11-02 Thread Gilberto Bertin
tually working with IPv4 (as I said I'm using a recent kernel, 4.1), and the fact that you say it's not supposed to work leads me to think that maybe we are not talking about the same feature. Cheers, gilberto -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netd

Re: [BUG] Any-IP IPv6 support broken

2015-10-29 Thread Gilberto Bertin
with the IPv4 behaviour? (or maybe it's not supposed to work even with IPv4 addresses, and so this is a bug) thank you, Gilberto.-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[BUG] Any-IP IPv6 support broken

2015-10-29 Thread Gilberto Bertin
Hello, testing Any-IP on my machine, I noticed that it's not working with IPv6 addresses. Tests are performed on a 4.1 kernel. Steps to reproduce the bug: 1- make sure Any-IP is working with IPv4 addresses: # ip -4 route add local 4.4.4.0/24 dev eth0 with this command every packets with an IP i