Re: [Oops] unix_dgram_connect locking problem?

2007-06-01 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 03:22:27PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Frederik Deweerdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:00:14 +0200 > > > I'm seeing an Oops[1] with a 2.6.19.2 kernel: > > Frederik, I finally was able to spend some quality time o

Re: [Oops] unix_dgram_connect locking problem?

2007-05-14 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
Hi David, On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 03:20:54AM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Frederik Deweerdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:00:14 +0200 > > > I think that not unix_state_rlock'ing "other" in > > unix_dgram_connect may c

[Oops] unix_dgram_connect locking problem?

2007-05-11 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
Hi, I'm seeing an Oops[1] with a 2.6.19.2 kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 018c printing eip: c01cc54f *pde = Oops: [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: ipmi_si ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler nfsd exportfs i8xx_tco i2c_dev i2c_core

Re: Strange soft lockup detected message (looks like spin_lock bug in pcnet32)

2007-05-07 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:08:07AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 03:02:36PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > > Well I don't know, but something is going wrong and causing the soft > > lock up. I must admit I am surprised if an interrupt can occour while > > handling an i

Re: Strange soft lockup detected message (looks like spin_lock bug in pcnet32)

2007-05-04 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 11:19:34AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 04:33:26PM +0200, Frederik Deweerdt wrote: > > On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 10:10:24AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > > > On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 04:31:43PM -0400, Lenn

Re: Strange soft lockup detected message (looks like spin_lock bug in pcnet32)

2007-05-04 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 10:10:24AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 04:31:43PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: [...] > Should line 2563 be a spin_lock_irqsave instead along with the > appropriate unluck later? IIRC, when you enable lockdep, it will complain about spinlocks us

Re: [take37 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism (socket, pipes, files, signals, AIO, timers, posix timers...).

2007-02-22 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 04:54:52PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > Changes from 'take36' patchset: > * ported to 2.6.21-rc1 Hi Evgeniy, The changes below were needed to be able to compile take37 on 2.6.21-rc1 with: CONFIG_KEVENT=y CONFIG_KEVENT_USER_STAT=y CONFIG_KEVENT_TIMER=y CONFIG_KEVENT_P

Re: [BUG] e100: eth0 appers many times in /proc/interrupts after resume

2007-01-21 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 01:45:27PM -0800, Auke Kok wrote: > Frederik Deweerdt wrote: > >On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:17:41PM +0200, Andrei Popa wrote: > >>It's the 10th resume and in /proc/interrupts eth0 appers 10 times. > >The e100_resume() function should be ca

Re: [PATCH 5/5] Solve host error problem in low performance embedded system when continune down and up.

2006-10-02 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 02:26:36PM -0400, Jesse Huang wrote: > From: Jesse Huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Change Logs: > Solve host error problem in low performance embedded system when continune > down and up. > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > > drivers/net/sundance.c