Re: stateless 1:1 NAT

2007-11-09 Thread Florin Andrei
Herbert Xu wrote: Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: OK, if I download 2.6.24-rc1, will it have this feature already? Yes. OK, I want to test this feature with 2.6.24-rc2. I compiled iproute2-2.6.23 with your patch applied. The problem is, I have no experience with tc (an

Re: stateless 1:1 NAT

2007-10-26 Thread Florin Andrei
Patrick McHardy wrote: Florin Andrei wrote: OpenBSD 4.1 as a firewall fails even worse in this test case (it freezes instantly). OpenBSD 4.2 works fine under the UDP flood, as if nothing happened. And Linux 2.6.23? :) Same as 2.6.18, actually maybe a little bit worse than .18: the current

Re: stateless 1:1 NAT

2007-10-24 Thread Florin Andrei
Herbert Xu wrote: Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've heard that stateless 1:1 NAT will be possible with the upcoming 2.6.24 kernel. I'd like to test that feature, but I'm not sure when it will actually be included. Will it be present in the release candidate

Re: stateless 1:1 NAT

2007-10-17 Thread Florin Andrei
Patrick McHardy wrote: And Linux 2.6.23? :) Alright, I get it. :-) Building kernel 2.6.23.1 as we speak. -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo inf

Re: stateless 1:1 NAT

2007-10-17 Thread Florin Andrei
Herbert Xu wrote: Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've heard that stateless 1:1 NAT will be possible with the upcoming 2.6.24 kernel. I'd like to test that feature, but I'm not sure when it will actually be included. Will it be present in the release candidate

stateless 1:1 NAT

2007-10-16 Thread Florin Andrei
I've heard that stateless 1:1 NAT will be possible with the upcoming 2.6.24 kernel. I'd like to test that feature, but I'm not sure when it will actually be included. Will it be present in the release candidates for 2.6.24? I just need a somewhat stable kernel tree to play w