Re: [RFT] skge: fiber carrier handling

2007-07-12 Thread Chris Stromsoe
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote: Does this fix your problems? I don't have dual port boards but have an old SK-9843 fiber board. Nope. It still hangs with: fresno:~# ip li set eth2 up fresno:~# ip li set eth2 down fresno:~# ip li set eth3 up This is with 2.6.22.1 If I load th

Re: [git patches] net driver updates

2007-07-11 Thread Chris Stromsoe
This is probably going to cause a new entry in regressions list, as at least Chris Stromsoe has reported bonding-related problems with skge that don't happen with sklin - http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0707.1/1158.html It's worse than just bonding related. This al

Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled sk98lin removal

2007-07-10 Thread Chris Stromsoe
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Chris Stromsoe wrote: On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:44:35 -0400 Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Adrian Bunk wrote: This patch contains the scheduled removal of the sk98lin driver. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL

Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled sk98lin removal

2007-07-10 Thread Chris Stromsoe
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:44:35 -0400 Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Adrian Bunk wrote: This patch contains the scheduled removal of the sk98lin driver. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Stephen -- ACK? Yes. Existing driver

Re: skge- "soft lockup on CPU#0" with mtu=9000 (2.6.20.1 + web100 patch)

2007-05-08 Thread Chris Stromsoe
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Chris Stromsoe wrote: On Mon, 12 Mar 2007, Chris Stromsoe wrote: On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Chris Stromsoe wrote: On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Jay Vosburgh wrote: Chris Stromsoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 1) ip link set mtu 9000 eth2 <-- eth2 is no longer responsive ip lin

Re: skge- "soft lockup on CPU#0" with mtu=9000 (2.6.20.1 + web100 patch)

2007-05-08 Thread Chris Stromsoe
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007, Chris Stromsoe wrote: On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Chris Stromsoe wrote: On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Jay Vosburgh wrote: Chris Stromsoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 1) ip link set mtu 9000 eth2 <-- eth2 is no longer responsive ip link set mtu 1500 eth2 <-- eth2 remains unr

Re: [PATCH] skge: set mac address bonding fix

2007-03-12 Thread Chris Stromsoe
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote: Sounds like a dual-port only problem.. Unfortunately, I don't have actual dual port skge hardware to test. Try this: That doesn't change the behavior at all. I tested against 2.6.20.2 with skge from git and against 2.6.21-rc3-git7. -Chris - To

Re: [PATCH] skge: set mac address bonding fix

2007-03-12 Thread Chris Stromsoe
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote: When bonding does fail over it calls set_mac_address. When this happens as the result of another port going down, the phy_mutex that is common to both ports is held, so it deadlocks. Setting the address doesn't need to do anything that needs the p

Re: skge- "soft lockup on CPU#0" with mtu=9000 (2.6.20.1 + web100 patch)

2007-03-12 Thread Chris Stromsoe
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Chris Stromsoe wrote: On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Jay Vosburgh wrote: Chris Stromsoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 1) ip link set mtu 9000 eth2 <-- eth2 is no longer responsive ip link set mtu 1500 eth2 <-- eth2 remains unresponsive 2) ifup eth2 ifdown eth2

Re: skge- "soft lockup on CPU#0" with mtu=9000 (2.6.20.1 + web100 patch)

2007-03-08 Thread Chris Stromsoe
7, Jay Vosburgh wrote: Chris Stromsoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 1) ip link set mtu 9000 eth2 <-- eth2 is no longer responsive ip link set mtu 1500 eth2 <-- eth2 remains unresponsive 2) ifup eth2 ifdown eth2 perl -pi -e 's/eth2/eth3/' /etc/network/interfac

Re: skge- "soft lockup on CPU#0" with mtu=9000 (2.6.20.1 + web100 patch)

2007-03-08 Thread Chris Stromsoe
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 13:31:13 -0800 (PST) Chris Stromsoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks. That fixes the soft lockup. I've got another problem now. The cards I'm using are dual port (sk-9844). I am bonding both ports together. T

Re: skge- "soft lockup on CPU#0" with mtu=9000 (2.6.20.1 + web100 patch)

2007-03-08 Thread Chris Stromsoe
Thanks. That fixes the soft lockup. I've got another problem now. The cards I'm using are dual port (sk-9844). I am bonding both ports together. The card presents as eth2 and eth3. If I remove eth2 from the bond so that eth3 is the active interface, I get a hard lock (nothing prints to s

skge- "soft lockup on CPU#0" with mtu=9000 (2.6.20.1 + web100 patch)

2007-03-08 Thread Chris Stromsoe
Within 2 or 3 minutes after issuing ip link set bond1 mtu 9000 I get one "NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth2: transmit timed out" to the console, and then this starts to repeat: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x19/0x2e [] show_trace+0x12/0x14 [] dump_stack+0x14/0x16 [] softl

ignore; Re: "skge 0000:01:0a.0: unsupported phy type 0x0"

2007-03-05 Thread Chris Stromsoe
Ignore this. I rebooted into the wrong kernel and was testing with 2.6.16 instead of 2.6.20. It works fine with 2.6.20. -Chris On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Chris Stromsoe wrote: I have a bunch of dual-port SK 98xx cards that work with sk98lin but not with skge. After loading skge, I get ACPI

Re: "skge 0000:01:0a.0: unsupported phy type 0x0"

2007-03-05 Thread Chris Stromsoe
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote: What kernel version. Type 0 is XMAC support, and that was added to a fairly recent kernel (2.6.19?) It was an old kernel. I booted into 2.6.16 instead of 2.6.20. See my follow-up (and ignore the report). -Chris - To unsubscribe from this list:

"skge 0000:01:0a.0: unsupported phy type 0x0"

2007-03-05 Thread Chris Stromsoe
I have a bunch of dual-port SK 98xx cards that work with sk98lin but not with skge. After loading skge, I get ACPI: PCI Interrupt :01:0a.0[A] -> Link [LNKC] -> GSI 10 (level, low) -> IRQ 10 skge :01:0a.0: unsupported phy type 0x0 ACPI: PCI interrupt for device :01:0a.0 disabled skg