On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Andrew Shewmaker wrote:
>> If alpha is strictly reduced by alpha >> dctcp_shift_g and if alpha is less
>> than 1 << dctcp_shift_g, then alpha may never reach zero. For example,
>> given shift_g=4 and
If alpha is strictly reduced by alpha >> dctcp_shift_g and if alpha is less
than 1 << dctcp_shift_g, then alpha may never reach zero. For example,
given shift_g=4 and alpha=15, alpha >> dctcp_shift_g yields 0 and alpha
remains 15. The effect isn't noticeable in this case below cwnd=137, but
could g
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 02:28:00AM -0700, Andrew Shewmaker wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 09:57:42PM -0700, Yuchung Cheng wrote:
> ...
> > diff --git a/include/linux/tcp.h b/include/linux/tcp.h
> > index 86a7eda..90edef5 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/tcp.h
>
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 10:33:41AM -0400, Neal Cardwell wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 5:28 AM, Andrew Shewmaker wrote:
> >> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> >> index 38743e5..e177386 100644
> >> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
&
rtt_us);
> }
This didn't apply to net-next for me. I see seq_rtt_us instead of
rtt_us and a check on the existence of tp->srtt_us. Maybe I've
misapplied the patch? I'll try again and test the patch series
against the bad behavior I mentioned above as soon as I can.
Hopefully t
