Re: [PATCH] netfilter/ipvs: immediately expire UDP connections matching unavailable destination if expire_nodest_conn=1

2020-05-19 Thread Andrew Kim
ion is closed > > I think it should be at least "and the client program" instead of > "then the client program". > Or a more detailed explanation. > > Thanks > Marco Angaroni > > > Il giorno lun 18 mag 2020 alle ore 22:06 Andrew Kim > h

Re: [PATCH] netfilter/ipvs: immediately expire UDP connections matching unavailable destination if expire_nodest_conn=1

2020-05-18 Thread Andrew Kim
Hi Julian, Thank you for getting back to me. I will update the patch based on your feedback shortly. Regards, Andrew On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 3:10 PM Julian Anastasov wrote: > > > Hello, > > On Sun, 17 May 2020, Andrew Sy Kim wrote: > > > If expire_nodest_conn=1 and a UDP destination is

Re: [PATCH] netfilter/ipvs: expire no destination UDP connections when expire_nodest_conn=1

2020-05-17 Thread Andrew Kim
I sent a new patch diff based on my ask above. Please take a look :) Thanks, Andrew Sy Kim On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 1:27 PM Andrew Kim wrote: > > Hi Julian, > > Thanks for getting back to me, that makes sense. > > Would you be opposed to trying to expire all UDP connections ma

Re: [PATCH] netfilter/ipvs: expire no destination UDP connections when expire_nodest_conn=1

2020-05-17 Thread Andrew Kim
Hi Julian, Thanks for getting back to me, that makes sense. Would you be opposed to trying to expire all UDP connections matching a deleted destination only if expire_nodest_conn=1? Even today with `expire_nodest_conn=1`, many packets could be dropped if there are many requests from a single clie