hand waving ?
Sorry!
Regards
Anand
On 8/3/05, Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 03:20:09PM +0530, Anand SVR wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > While browsing through the code, I encountered instances in
> > ipv4/netfilter where checksum relate
Hi,
While browsing through the code, I encountered instances in
ipv4/netfilter where checksum related calls are made in ip_nat_core.c
and other files. Wondering if netfilter should be made aware of tso so
that the checksum operation can be avoided altogether under such
circumstances since hardware
TED]> wrote:
> * Anand SVR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-08-08 15:07
> > I am happy to know that there is a way of achieving http level packet
> > classification once the connection tracking is also in place. We can
> > even think of other string combinations for url based cl
just what I mentioned in my earlier mail.
All said done, since most of the traffic is anyway dominated by http,
I feel it is worth providing differentation among the competing web
flows. No ?
Regards
Anand
On 8/7/05, Thomas Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Anand SVR <[EMAIL PROTECT
Hi,
I am one of the network admins of a campus of large community who
tries to make sure that the academic community is kept happy in spite
of a congested access link. My professor keeps asking me why can't you
give higher bandwidth for web access to educational, and any academic
related sites. I
