Re: [PATCH 6/7] NetXen: Fixes for Power PC architecture

2007-04-17 Thread Amit Kale
On Friday 13 April 2007 21:24, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 08:42:57AM -0700, Linsys Contractor Mithlesh Thukral wrote: > > NetXen: Configurable interrupts on PPC architecture > > This patch will add support to add command line argument to specify > > the interrupt type on a

Re: [PATCH 3/7] NetXen: Multi PCI support for Quad cards

2007-04-17 Thread Amit Kale
On Monday 16 April 2007 23:19, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:39:31 -0700 > > Linsys Contractor Mithlesh Thukral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > NetXen: Fix the multi PCI function for cards with more than 2 ports. > > This patch fixes the working of multi PCI capable driver on car

Re: [PATCH] netxen: enum and #define cleanups

2007-03-22 Thread Amit Kale
On Thursday 22 March 2007 00:46, Andy Gospodarek wrote: > This patch cleans up some rather generically named items in the netxen > driver. It seems bad to use names like USER_START and FLASH_TOTAL_SIZE, > so I added a NETXEN_ to the front of them. > > This has been compile tested. > > Signed-off-b

Re: [PATCH 0/5] NetXen: Driver bug fixes

2007-03-12 Thread Amit Kale
On Monday 12 March 2007 20:01, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Amit Kale wrote: > > On Saturday 10 March 2007 16:52, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >> Amit Kale wrote: > >>> On Friday 09 March 2007 22:26, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>>> Linsys Contractor Mithlesh Thukral wro

Re: [PATCH 0/5] NetXen: Driver bug fixes

2007-03-11 Thread Amit Kale
On Saturday 10 March 2007 16:52, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Amit Kale wrote: > > On Friday 09 March 2007 22:26, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >> Linsys Contractor Mithlesh Thukral wrote: > >>> Hi All, > >>> > >>> I will be sending updates to NetXen: 1G/10G

Re: [PATCH 1/5] NetXen: Fix softlock seen on some machines during hardware writes

2007-03-09 Thread Amit Kale
On Friday 09 March 2007 21:56, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Linsys Contractor Mithlesh Thukral wrote: > > NetXen: This will fix a softlock seen on some machines. > > The reason was too much time was spent waiting for writes to go through. > > > > Signed-off by: Mithlesh Thukral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: [PATCH 0/5] NetXen: Driver bug fixes

2007-03-09 Thread Amit Kale
On Friday 09 March 2007 22:26, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Linsys Contractor Mithlesh Thukral wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I will be sending updates to NetXen: 1G/10G Ethernet driver in subsequent > > mails. The patches will be with respect to netdev#upstream. > > Are you sure you don't want some of these i

Re: [PATCH] netxen: do_rom_fast_write error handling

2007-02-26 Thread Amit Kale
Ah.. missed that. Thanks. -Amit On Tuesday 27 February 2007 04:21, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Compiler warning spots real error! > > The function do_rom_fast_read called in do_rom_fast_write can fail > and leave data1 unset. This causes a compile warning. > The correct thing is to propagate the er

Re: NetXen driver name

2007-02-12 Thread Amit Kale
On Monday 12 February 2007 13:59, Al Viro wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:12:56AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Monday 12 February 2007 09:03, Amit Kale wrote: > > > The already released kernel contains a broken driver. It broke due to > > > some code rearrangemen

Re: NetXen driver name

2007-02-12 Thread Amit Kale
The already released kernel contains a broken driver. It broke due to some code rearrangement changes someone submitted to fix sparse warnings. -Amit On Thursday 08 February 2007 23:45, Andi Kleen wrote: > Amit Kale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hi, > > > > NetXen

Re: NetXen driver name

2007-02-12 Thread Amit Kale
Sending it again from correct smtp server. On Monday 12 February 2007 13:42, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Monday 12 February 2007 09:03, Amit Kale wrote: > > The already released kernel contains a broken driver. It broke due to > > some code rearrangement changes someone submitte

Re: NetXen driver name

2007-02-12 Thread Amit Kale
On Monday 12 February 2007 13:42, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Monday 12 February 2007 09:03, Amit Kale wrote: > > The already released kernel contains a broken driver. It broke due to > > some code rearrangement changes someone submitted to fix sparse warnings. > > You mean it

NetXen driver name

2007-02-08 Thread Amit Kale
Hi, NetXen ethernet driver present in 2.6.20 has name "netxen_nic". The product itself is refered to as "nx_nic". To make it inline with the product, would it be a good idea to change the name of the driver to "nx_nic"? Thanks. -Amit - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe n

Re: [PATCH 1/2] NetXen: Added ethtool support for user level tools

2007-01-31 Thread Amit Kale
Ueimor, Jeff, Thanks for reviewing. We are integrating these into our code and will send an update tomorrow. -Amit On Wednesday 31 January 2007 15:46, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Amit S. Kale wrote: > > Added ethtool support for user level firmware management utilities. > > > > Signed-off-by: Amit S.

Re: [PATCH] netxen_nic_main.c: Convert pci_module_init() to pci_register_driver()

2007-01-12 Thread Amit Kale
That's a good change. Thanks. -Amit On Friday 12 January 2007 18:49, Richard Knutsson wrote: > Signed-off-by: Richard Knutsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > > diff --git a/drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic_main.c > b/drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic_main.c index 8a5792f..96e1bee 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/

Re: [PATCH 7/8] NetXen: Fix for PPC machines.

2006-12-26 Thread Amit Kale
Thanks a lot for applying. We'll definitely take care of the patch format problems you've pointed out. -Amit On Wednesday 27 December 2006 03:19, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Amit S. Kale wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Amit S. Kale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > netxen_nic.h |2 +- > > netxen_nic_init.

Re: [PATCH 2/9] NetXen 1G/10G driver

2006-04-04 Thread Amit Kale
Thanks. We'll implement these along with the changes suggested by others and post this driver again. -Amit On Tuesday 04 Apr 2006 1:11 am, Francois Romieu wrote: > Linsys Contractor Amit S. Kale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > > diff -Naru linux-2.6.16_orig/drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic_ethtool.c > > lin

Re: [PATCH 1.1/9] NetXen 1G/10G driver

2006-04-04 Thread Amit Kale
Hi Stephen, Thanks for your feedback. We'll implement these and post the driver again. -Amit On Monday 03 Apr 2006 10:19 pm, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On > > > +#undef NetXen_LOOPBACK > > +#undef SINGLE_DMA_BUF > > +#define NetXen_NIC_HW_CSUM > > +#define NetXen_NIC_NAPI > > +// #undef NetXen_NI

Re: [PATCH 0/9] NetXen 1G/10G driver

2006-04-02 Thread Amit Kale
On Monday 03 Apr 2006 3:18 am, Roland Dreier wrote: > - Please try to use software to post your patches so that they end up >nicely threaded via In-Reply-To: headers. And also try to plan >ahead enough so that you don't end up things like "[PATCH 1.2/9]". >Finally, please try to give

Re: [PATCH 1.1/9] NetXen 1G/10G driver

2006-04-02 Thread Amit Kale
Thanks, Andi. We are working on reducing this space to get rid of as many pages as possible. We'll also work on making some of the pages dyanamic. -Amit On Sunday 02 Apr 2006 6:11 pm, Andi Kleen wrote: > > +/* 128 Meg of memory */ > > +DPRINTK(1, INFO, "ioremap from %lx a size of

Re: UNM NIC driver

2005-11-22 Thread Amit Kale
Hi Jeff, It's a 10G NIC. There are Tx / Rx descriptor rings (sizes etc. are described in the header files). It supports MSI interrupts; can do hardware checksums and LSO. -Amit On Monday 21 Nov 2005 9:43 pm, Jeff Garzik wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 08:08:32AM -0800, Amit S. Kale wrote: >