Resubmitting the patch.
This patch improves ethtool support for printing correct ring statistics,
segmentation offload status, etc.
Signed-off by: Dhananjay Phadke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: netdev-2.6/drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic.h
Hi,
[Adding netdev and wireless to CC]
On 02/09/07, Florian Lohoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> with current git i got this when "ifconfig eth1" down. eth1 had a mac
> address which looked really like an eth1394 ethernet although the module
> was not loaded. Something is really broken in
Hi,
am am looking for this issue for some time now, but there where no
errors in 2.6.22-r2 (gentoo speak, I guess this is 2.6.22.2
officially), I also ran git-bisect (for more information see the older
messages in this thread).
2007/9/3, Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> On 01/09/0
Hi,
On 01/09/07, Karl Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is what happened today:
>
> Sep 1 21:08:01 frege NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
> frege ~ # uname -r
> 2.6.22.5-cfs-v20.5
Can you reproduce this on 2.6.22 (not 2.6.22.x - it might be a -stable
regression)?
Regards,
Michal
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 01:52:45PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 06:36:19 +0400 Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The bad news is something knocked off box from the net, then panicked it:
>
> Yeah, the net tree has been quite bad lately. Unusually bad - it's usua
Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Patrick McHardy wrote:
This is not a ATM/ADSL only patch. This patch simply adds more
flexibility to the rate tables. Afterwards we can start the discussion
about how to use this new flexibility in tc/iproute2.
I know, but that discussion s
> On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 06:36:19 +0400 Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 09:58:22PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc4/2.6.23-rc4-mm1/
> > - dynticks-for-x86_64 has returned
>
> Good news is that,
Hm...
Not good.
After patch NETCONSOLE log:
THERE MANY MESSAGES LIKE DOWN
[16038.677029] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_htb.c:362 htb_safe_rb_erase()
[16038.677031] [] htb_dequeue+0x13d/0x6d2 [sch_htb]
[16038.677038] [] __qdisc_run+0x2a/0x16b
[16038.677043] [] dev_queue_xmit+0x18b/0x2a6
net/sunrpc/svc.c: In function ‘__svc_create_thread’:
net/sunrpc/svc.c:550: warning: ‘oldmask.bits[0u]’ may be used uninitialized in
this function
is a bogus warning, but gcc isn't smart enough to see why. We cannot just
reorganize the code in the function, because we want the set_cpus_allowed()
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Patrick McHardy wrote:
Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Patrick McHardy wrote:
This is not a ATM/ADSL only patch. This patch simply adds more
flexibility to the rate tables. Afterwards we can start the discussion
about how to use this new flexibility
This has been pretty interesting for me to watch as I distribute my
isp driver under a dual license (at least the portions of it which are
common with the *BSD and Solaris ports) that is almost identical to
Sam's verbiage.
I'll admit that I hadn't thought about whether redistribution included
the
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 03:00:46PM +0200, Igor Sobrado wrote:
> >Not strictly true. They can either agree to a change and issue one or
> >they can convey to other parties the right to change the terms. The GPL
> >for example does this for version selection.
>
> So, under a dual-licensed BSD/GPL co
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
Vendor module calls kernel api incorrectly. dev_set_promiscuity requires
that the calling thread hold rtnl mutex (ie call rtnl_lock). It's their bug,
netdev doesn't want to hear about it.
OK, that's all I needed to know. Thank you both for your comme
On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 18:05 +0200, Christian Kujau wrote:
> but given the amount of changes currently
> going into net/ I thought this might be interesting:
>
> [15604.137408] RTNL: assertion failed at net/core/dev.c (2595)
> [15604.138807] [] __dev_set_promiscuity+0xc2/0xd0
> [15604.139163] [
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 18:05:33 +0200 (CEST)
Christian Kujau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow, I should really update more often. Skipping the last -rc versions
> AND adding a new device (zd1211rw) to the box turns out to be quite
> interesting ([0],[1]).
>
> However, this time loading of a (propri
Wow, I should really update more often. Skipping the last -rc versions
AND adding a new device (zd1211rw) to the box turns out to be quite
interesting ([0],[1]).
However, this time loading of a (proprietary) module is involved. Knowing
that lkml cannot really help here (and I should contact vmw
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
WRT Atheros driver I'd probably leave the thing as is (i.e., BSD/GPL
= in fact BSD), unless something like 50+% of the code is rewritten -
it's mostly their hard work after all, isn't it? Not legal
requirement, though.
Yes. T
2007/9/1, Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> John W. Linville napsal(a):
> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 12:00:09PM -0400, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >> ath5k, use int as retval
> >>
> >> Convert some functions to return int and proper negative return value on
> >> error as we are used to.
> >
> > Since I didn
Igor Sobrado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When code is multi-licensed it must be distributed under *all* these
> licensing terms concurrently.
No. E.g.:
If I don't agree to the GPL (or if I had violated it and therefore have lost
it's privileges), I MUST NOT redistribute it under the GPL because
Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
> On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>> Am I guessing right that the intention is to resurrect the ATM patch?
>
>
> Yes, you are right.
> Remember, Jamal ACKed the patch, and you redrew your NAK.
Mainly out of frustration/boredom with the discussion,
Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
WRT Atheros driver I'd probably leave the thing as is (i.e., BSD/GPL
= in fact BSD), unless something like 50+% of the code is rewritten -
it's mostly their hard work after all, isn't it? Not legal
requirement, though.
Yes. This deserves to be reinforced:
There is defi
IANAL, but:
Igor Sobrado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, under a dual-licensed BSD/GPL code the latter license allows a
> developer to remove the GPL license itself and release a
> single-licensed BSD code if other parties want to do it?
Of course. If it wasn't legal, dual BSD/GPL would just b
> > Not strictly true. They can either agree to a change and issue one or
> > they can convey to other parties the right to change the terms. The GPL
> > for example does this for version selection.
>
> So, under a dual-licensed BSD/GPL code the latter license allows a
> developer to remove the G
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 03:00:46PM +0200, Igor Sobrado wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
>
>>> So, a multi-licensed file remains multi-licensed except when all authors
>>> agree about a change in the licensing terms. And it is clear on the BSD
>>
>> Not strictly true. They can either ag
Hi,
after upgrading to 2.6.23-rc5 (and applying davem's fix [0]), lockdep
was quite noisy when I tried to shape my external (wireless) interface:
[ 6400.534545] FahCore_78.exe/3552 just changed the state of lock:
[ 6400.534713] (&dev->ingress_lock){-+..}, at: []
netif_receive_skb+0x2d5/0x3c0
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
So, a multi-licensed file remains multi-licensed except when all authors
agree about a change in the licensing terms. And it is clear on the BSD
Not strictly true. They can either agree to a change and issue one or
they can convey to other parties the right
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
You can shout this all you like but you would be wrong. You can remove
the licence if you have permission to do so. For the ath c files there
was permission to do so.
There was permission to do so from Reyk Floeter? Really?
Your understanding isn't quite r
> So, a multi-licensed file remains multi-licensed except when all authors
> agree about a change in the licensing terms. And it is clear on the BSD
Not strictly true. They can either agree to a change and issue one or
they can convey to other parties the right to change the terms. The GPL
for
Igor Sobrado wrote:
When code is multi-licensed it must be distributed under *all* these
licensing terms concurrently. It is easy to understand. Removing (or
changing) the conditions that apply to the program from the source code
and documentation *without* an authorization from all the autho
On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 13:20:27 +0200 (CEST)
Igor Sobrado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
> > You can shout this all you like but you would be wrong. You can remove
> > the licence if you have permission to do so. For the ath c files there
> > was permission to do so.
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 01:20:27PM +0200, Igor Sobrado wrote:
Reyk code was never dual licensed! His code is under truly free licensing
terms (BSD).
Jiri's patch touched both files containing BSD-only code by Reyk and
code Reyk contributed to leaving the
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Herbert Xu wrote:
You want this patch (by davem).
I applied the patch and the box is up for 1hr now. Since I was able to
reproduce the oops pretty reliable with this bittorrent thingy, I
did the same a few times now, but the box did NOT crash :)
Unfortunately people are
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Mark Hindley wrote:
>
> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
> 0025
> [...]
> Call Trace:
> [] tcp_rtt_estimator+0xba/0x100
> [...]
> EIP: [] tcp_rto_min+0x8/0x12 SS:ESP 0068:c0341dec
Third report of this oops within past
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 01:20:27PM +0200, Igor Sobrado wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
>> You can shout this all you like but you would be wrong. You can remove
>> the licence if you have permission to do so. For the ath c files there
>> was permission to do so.
>
> There was permissio
On Sep 1 2007 18:36, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
>When companies have taken our wireless device drivers, many many of
>them have given changes and fixes back. Some maybe didn't, but that
>is OK.
For companies it's ok, but for linux people it is not?
(1) You do not know how much of the modifications
Thats normal.
Check arp_filter sysctl :
arp_filter - BOOLEAN
1 - Allows you to have multiple network interfaces on the same
subnet, and have the ARPs for each interface be answered
based on whether or not the kernel would route a packet from
the ARP'd IP out that int
Sorry forgot, maybe also arp_ignore is related to that
--
Denys Fedoryshchenko
Technical Manager
Virtual ISP S.A.L.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Satyam Sharma wrote:
net/sched/sch_cbq.c: In function 'cbq_enqueue':
net/sched/sch_cbq.c:383: warning: 'ret' may be used uninitialized in this
function
has been verified to be a bogus case. So let's shut it up.
Signed-off-by: Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Patrick McHardy <[EMAI
I have now got an oops trace out of this box, which I presume has been
the cause of the previously observed hangs.
To my inexperienced eye it looks like it is related to via-rhine.
Thanks
Mark
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
0025
prin
Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Moni Shoua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Jay Vosburgh wrote:
>>> Moni Shoua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
When bonding enslaves non Ethernet devices it takes pointers to functions
in the module that owns the slaves. In this case it becomes unsafe
to keep th
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 09:58:22PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>...
> Changes since 2.6.23-rc3-mm1:
>...
> git-net.patch
>...
> git trees
>...
This patch fixes the following compile error:
<-- snip -->
...
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
net/built-in.o: In function `inet6_csk_xmit':
(.text+0x72b0f):
Just checked this in...
commit 2c0205e3480ac39f5b52b2220ff0c77141502936
Author: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun Sep 2 07:13:36 2007 -0400
[ETHTOOL] Provide default behaviors for a few ethtool sub-ioctls
For the operations
get-tx-csum
get-sg
get-
Herbert Xu wrote:
Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks. I'm not sure either, it would require two concurrent requests
to be processed, but AFAICS oidentd only uses a single netlink socket.
Perhaps multiple running instances or something else using the inet_diag
interface?
Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/net/apne.c |2 +-
drivers/net/arm/am79c961a.c|2 +-
drivers/net/atarilance.c |2 +-
drivers/net/atl1/atl1_hw.c |2 +-
drivers/net/bnx2.c
Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/atm/proc.c |2 +-
net/decnet/dn_dev.c |2 +-
net/ipv4/af_inet.c |2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/atm/proc.c b/net/atm/proc.c
index 99fc1fe..a3e52ff 100644
--- a/net/atm/proc.c
+++ b/ne
> - If you receive ISC or BSD licensed code, you may not delete the
> license. Same principle, since the notice says so. It's the law.
> Really.
You can shout this all you like but you would be wrong. You can remove
the licence if you have permission to do so. For the ath c files there
was per
> co-operation. Together we advance our detective work and knowledge of
> the Macintosh platforms to the good of all Macintosh users dumped"
>
> Alan Cox circa 1999.
>
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2007-August/027419.html
>
> "well I'd be quite happy to see X go GPL but I'm aware
remove setup platform device from jazzsonic, which is done in arch code now
Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/net/jazzsonic.c b/drivers/net/jazzsonic.c
index 75f6f44..435060a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/jazzsonic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/jazzsonic.c
@@ -45,7
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On this machine (Athlon 64 X2 4600, 4 GiB memory, lots of disks),
> > > > 2.6.23-rc1-mm2 runs fine. 2.6.23-rc4-mm1 reproducably dies within
> > > > seconds of
> > > > starting
> > > > a rsync session
defconfig fails with the following error on parisc:
<-- snip -->
...
CC net/core/gen_estimator.o
In file included from include2/asm/bitops.h:111,
from
/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.23-rc4-mm1/net/core/gen_estimator.c:18:
/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.23-
TJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Therefore, anyone deploying apache web servers in a web-farm behind the
> Juniper DX load-balanders and using TCP multiplexing (for which they pay
> a hefty licence fee!)
If they ask for that much money they can surely fix it to work
properly too?
-Andi
-
To
51 matches
Mail list logo
