It was a multi-day uphill battle but I got it done just
now.
kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6.22.git
kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/tcp-2.6.git
As before, tcp-2.6.git is net-2.6.22 cloned with the TCP RB-Tree
work added.
An allmodconfig build went o
From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:19:02 +0300 (EEST)
> [PATCH] [TCP]: Sed magic converts func(sk, tp, ...) -> func(sk, ...)
I decided to apply this to my net-2.6.22 tree, I'll deal with
the tcp-2.6 merge conflicts as best as I can.
-
To unsubscribe from this list
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:04:54 +0900 (JST)
> [IPV6] SNMP: Export statistics via netlink without CONFIG_PROC_FS.
>
> Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I applied this to my net-2.6.22 tree, thank you.
-
To unsubscribe from this
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:42:09 +0900 (JST)
> [IPV6] SNMP: Netlink interface.
> [IPV6] SNMP: Move some statistic bits to net/ipv6/proc.c.
> [IPV4] SNMP: Move some statistic bits to net/ipv4/proc.c.
I applied these as patches to my net
From: Borislav Petkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:49:52 +0200
> Correct the function name in the comments supplied with register_netdev()
>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Patch applied, thank you.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:32:09 +0300
> From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Spelling corrections, from "to" to "too".
>
> Signed-off-by: G. Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Also applied to net-2.6.22, than
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:32:08 +0300
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Applied to net-2.6.22, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kern
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:32:07 +0300
> Through a protocol specific ioctl, one can disable IrDA TX in order to
> monitor an IrDA link.
>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'd really rather see IRDA use netlink instead of these
wonky ioctls, but whatever, i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:32:06 +0300
> In af_irda.c, the multiple IRDA_ASSERT() are either hiding bugs, useless, or
> returning the wrong value.
> Let's clean that up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Applied to net-2.6.22, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe fro
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:32:05 +0300
> This patch removes a cut'n'paste copy of wait_event_interruptible
> from irda_accept.
>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Acked-by: Olaf Kirch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Applied to net-2.6.22, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe fro
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:32:04 +0300
> From: Olaf Kirch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This patch silences an IRDA_ASSERT in irda_recvmsg_stream, as described in
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7512 irda_disconnect_indication
> would set sk->sk_err to ECONNRESET, an
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:32:03 +0300
> From: Olaf Kirch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This patch cleans up some code in irda_recvmsg_stream, replacing some
> homebrew code with prepare_to_wait/finish_wait, and by making the
> code honor sock_rcvtimeo.
>
> Signed-off-by: Olaf K
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:07:43 -0700
>
> > This is an implementation of TCP Illinois invented by Shao Liu
> > at University of Illinois. It is a another variant of Reno
From: Florian Zumbiehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 01:44:05 +0200
> > This patch doesn't apply becuase in the actual pppoe.c code:
>
> [...]
>
> > So I'm having trouble figuring out what tree you generated
> > that patch against :-) Perhaps there was an earlier patch
> > I missed
From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 12:48:44 +0200
>
> The compiler eliminates them anyways and this makes the code easier to read
> and shorter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Actually I won't apply this patch, ever, -ENOCOMPILE.
Andi, please spare me
From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 12:48:44 +0200
> The compiler eliminates them anyways and this makes the code easier to read
> and shorter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It depends upon who you ask :-)
For someone trying to verify "all code paths l
From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 12:46:21 +0200
> It is far too large to be an inline and not in any hot paths.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Also applied, thanks Andi.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body o
From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 12:44:03 +0200
>
> The function is quite big and has several call sites and nothing
> to collapse by compiler optimization on inlining.
>
> Besides it's nicer to read in a in .c file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A
From: Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 18:03:04 +0200
> Hmm, no comment? The cleanup seems worth the effort, both for source
> code readability and binary size.
It's still in my patch backlog do not worry :-) I will get to
it eventually.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: sen
From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 12:00:09 -0700
> Spring cleaning time...
>
> There seems to be a lot of places in the network code that have
> extra bogus semicolons after conditionals. Most commonly is a
> bogus semicolon after: switch() { }
>
> Signed-off-by:
From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:07:43 -0700
> This is an implementation of TCP Illinois invented by Shao Liu
> at University of Illinois. It is a another variant of Reno which adapts
> the alpha and beta parameters based on RTT. The basic idea is to increase
>
Hi,
> This patch doesn't apply becuase in the actual pppoe.c code:
[...]
> So I'm having trouble figuring out what tree you generated
> that patch against :-) Perhaps there was an earlier patch
> I missed or something.
>
> But I won't second guess and leave it to you to let me know
> what I sh
From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:26:35 -0700
> It isn't any faster to test a boolean global variable than do a
> simple check for empty list.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'll apply this, thanks Stephen.
I think the history is th
From: Michal Ostrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:09:35 -0500
> pppoe_flush_dev() kicks all sockets bound to a device that is going down.
> In doing so, locks must be taken in the right order consistently (sock lock,
> followed by the pppoe_hash_lock). However, the scan process
From: Michal Ostrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:09:34 -0500
> below you find a patch that fixes a memory leak when a PPPoE socket is
> release()d after it has been connect()ed, but before the PPPIOCGCHAN ioctl
> ever has been called on it.
>
> This is somewhat of a security p
From: Michal Ostrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:09:33 -0500
> below you find a patch that (hopefully) fixes a race between an interface
> going down and a connect() to a peer on that interface. Before,
> connect() would determine that an interface is up, then the interface
> c
From: Michal Ostrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:09:32 -0500
> below is a patch that just removes dead code/initializers without any
> effect (first access is an assignment) that I stumbled accross while
> reading the source.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Zumbiehl <[EMAIL PROTECT
From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:13:14 -0700
> Getting warnings becuase skb_store_bits has skb as constant,
> but the function overwrites it. Looks like const was on the
> wrong side.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Also applied, than
From: Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 11:24:03 +0100
> > the ipcomp handler is xfrm6_rcv(), which calls xfrm6_rcv_spi(), which
> > contrary
> > to all other handlers returns -1 instead of 0 after calling kfree_skb() on
> > the
> > skb. Changing the return value to 0 in
From: Michal Ostrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 21:36:56 -0500
> Attached below is my take on how to address this problem.
> This addresses any concerns you may have had about checking
> po->pppoe_dev==NULL,
> because accesses to this field are now synchronized with pppoe_hash
Getting warnings becuase skb_store_bits has skb as constant,
but the function overwrites it. Looks like const was on the
wrong side.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/linux/skbuff.h |4 ++--
net/core/skbuff.c |2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 22:53:22 +
> Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I finally applied this one, thanks for waiting so long :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordom
From: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 18:17:39 -0800
> Peter P. Waskiewicz Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> NET: Add packet sock option to return orig_dev to userspace when
> bonded
I'm going to apply this patch (by hand, your email client corrupted
the patch mas
On 04/20, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:41:46 +0100
> David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > There are only two non-net patches that AF_RXRPC depends on:
> >
> > (1) The key facility changes. That's all my code anyway, and shouldn't be
> > a
> > problem to merge
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 14:28:42 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8330
>
>Summary: lmc: copy_to/from_user cals while spinlock is held
> Kernel Version: 2.6.20
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
> Owner: [EMAIL
From: John Heffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:07:10 -0400
> This backs out the the transport layer MTU checks that don't work. As a
> consequence, I had to back out the PMTUDISC_PROBE patch as well. These
> patches should fix the problem with ipv6 that the transport layer ch
I am trying to NAT routed connections between pairs of devices very
much like the etun patch recently posted.
As far as I can tell, this is failing because the connection tracking
does not take the interface into account. The result is that if you
send on etun1a, receive on etun1b, and then rout
From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 00:04:51 +0200
> 0x8938 is SIOCGIFCOUNT. As far as I can see it is only defined in
> sockios.h, but not implemented?
>
> Should it be removed from the include file or implemented?
Unless we can be %100 certain not one build will break by
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:34:22 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8342
>
>Summary: sctp_getsockopt_local_addrs_old() calls copy_to_user()
> while a spinlock is held
> Kernel Version: 2.6.20
> Status: NEW
>
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:39:27 -0400 (EDT)
James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could be an upstream kernel issue lurking.
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:21:26 +0200
> From: Mark Stier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: FYI: Xen o
Could be an upstream kernel issue lurking.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:21:26 +0200
From: Mark Stier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FYI: Xen or kernel bug?
Hello,
tcp_vegas produces division by zero kernel oopses in dom0 when running
a Xe
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:21:10 -0500
Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:15:26AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:51:13 +0900
> > Keiichi KII <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > I started to do some cleanups and fixups here, but abandoned it
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:41:46 +0100
David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are only two non-net patches that AF_RXRPC depends on:
>
> (1) The key facility changes. That's all my code anyway, and shouldn't be a
> problem to merge unless someone else has put some changes in there th
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:15:26AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:51:13 +0900
> Keiichi KII <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > I started to do some cleanups and fixups here, but abandoned it when it
> > > was
> > > all getting a bit large.
> > >
> > > Here are some fixes ag
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:51:13 +0900
Keiichi KII <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I started to do some cleanups and fixups here, but abandoned it when it was
> > all getting a bit large.
> >
> > Here are some fixes against this patch:
>
> I'm going to fix my patches by following your reviews and sen
Il giorno 20/apr/07, alle ore 15:54, Neil Horman ha scritto:
Hey there-
The sis900 driver appears to have a bug in which the receive routine
passes the skbuff holding the received frame to the network stack
before
refilling the buffer in the rx ring. If a new skbuff cannot be
alloc
Alexandra N. Kossovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Fix bonding driver documentation for the case of multiple bonding interfaces.
>
>Signed-off-by: "Alexandra N. Kossovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I don't see a problem with this; users running distros that
require the multiple load fru fru sti
Neil Horman wrote:
Hey there-
The sis900 driver appears to have a bug in which the receive routine
passes the skbuff holding the received frame to the network stack before
refilling the buffer in the rx ring. If a new skbuff cannot be allocated, the
driver simply leaves a hole in the rx
NetXen: Remove 2 redundant macro definitions from header file.
Signed-off by: Mithlesh Thukral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic_phan_reg.h |2 --
1 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic_phan_reg.h
b/drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic_phan
NetXen: Port Swap feature
This patch will allow a port numbers on the card to be swapped in
host driver. This feature is applicable to cards having more than
1 port.
Signed-off by: Milan Bag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off by: Mithlesh Thukral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/net/netxen/netxen_
NetXen: Fix PPC architecture specific bugs
Fixes some issues seen on Big endian machines.
Signed-off by: Milan Bag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off by: Mithlesh Thukral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic.h |6 +++---
drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic_hw.c |3 +--
dr
NetXen: Fix vmalloc errors on seen on some X86 high end machines.
Signed-off by: Milan Bag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Mithlesh Thukral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic.h |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/netxen/netxe
NetXen: Fix the multi PCI function for cards with more than 2 ports.
This patch fixes the working of multi PCI capable driver on cards with
more than 2 ports by adding the addresses for their rings and sizes.
Signed-off by: Mithlesh Thukral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic
hi All,
Thanks Stephen for your suggestion. I am resending the 7 patches
after incorporating the suggestion.
These patches are with respect to netdev#upstream and we wish their inclusion
in 2.6.22 kernel.
Out of these the first 2 patches were already accepted into the netdev tree,
but we have r
NetXen: Removal of redundant function call parameters and bug fixes.
This patch will remove the redundant paramters which were being passed to
many functions since now adapter->portnum can be used.
Signed-off-by: Mithlesh Thukral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic.h |
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Kazunori MIYAZAWA wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I send patches to fix panic when using inter
> address family IPsec on loopback device.
>
> These patches can be applied to current linux-2.6 and
> should also be net-2.6.
Looks good to me, although I wonder why the !IFF_LOOPBACK check
From: Milan Kocian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
When you replace route via ip r r command the netlink multicast message
is not send. This patch corrects it. NL message is sent with
NLM_F_REPLACE flag. [Bug 8320]
---
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_hash.c 2007-04-18 12:50:11.0 +0200
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_has
Hey there-
The sis900 driver appears to have a bug in which the receive routine
passes the skbuff holding the received frame to the network stack before
refilling the buffer in the rx ring. If a new skbuff cannot be allocated, the
driver simply leaves a hole in the rx ring, which causes th
* Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...] I think the hangs that Ingo sees with forcedeth were preceded by
> mysterious and "impossible" NULL pointer oopses. Ingo?
update: the 'forcedeth NULL pointer oops' problem got resolved by one of
these commits:
commit 3ba4d093fe8a26f5f2da944
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The 6b6b6b6b pattern is POISON_FREE, implying some kind of slab
> > misuse, most likely a use-after-free, although possibly just due to
> > overrunning a slab into the next one or something like that.
>
> unfortunately, while being at -rc6 based ker
On 4/20/07, David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Aubrey Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> as checked in packet_set_ring, buffer size must be a multiple of PAGE_SIZE,
> packet_set_ring
> if (unlikely(req->tp_block_size & (PAGE_SIZE - 1)))
>
> So why n
Hi Diego,
I was probably misunderstanding your problem.
Ok, I used two machines, which were connected to different networks.
My topology was
[Host1][Router]-[Host2]
I configured Host1 and Host2 to communicate by using IPv6 over IPv4 IPsec
ESP tunnel mode. And they could communicate wit
Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it really possible to allocate an order-10 page, then release part of it
> (say an order-8 subpage) ?
Yes.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now that Herbert cleared up the crypto layer issues
> the only problem left is that there are generic changes
> in there which are not strictly networking but which
> your subsequent networking changes depend upon.
>
> This is a mess, and makes merging you
Hello,
I send patches to fix panic when using inter
address family IPsec on loopback device.
These patches can be applied to current linux-2.6 and
should also be net-2.6.
Best regards,
Signed-off-by: Kazunori MIYAZAWA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/ipv4/xfrm4_input.c |6 ++
net/ipv
Please include an update to Documentation/networking/netconsole.txt
OK, I update the documnet for the added functions in next patches.
Thank you for your comments.
--
Keiichi KII
NEC Corporation OSS Promotion Center
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsub
I started to do some cleanups and fixups here, but abandoned it when it was
all getting a bit large.
Here are some fixes against this patch:
I'm going to fix my patches by following your reviews and send new patches
on the LKML and the netdev ML in a few days.
Thank you for your comments and
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 09:58:52 +0100
David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Because kmalloc() may be able to get us a smaller chunk of memory. Actually,
> calling __get_free_pages() might be a better, and then release the excess
> pages.
Interesting, that rings a bell here.
I wonder why we
Aubrey Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> as checked in packet_set_ring, buffer size must be a multiple of PAGE_SIZE,
> packet_set_ring
> if (unlikely(req->tp_block_size & (PAGE_SIZE - 1)))
>
> So why not use __get_free_pages rather than kmalloc,
Because
From: David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 09:02:07 +0100
> David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I applied already the patches I thought were appropriate,
> > you had some crypto layer changes that you need to work
> > out with Herbert Xu before the rest can be applie
On 4/20/07, David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Aubrey Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The patch works properly on my side. But
> 1) I'm not sure why you re-wrote alloc/free_pg_vec function, doesn't
> the current implement work for NOMMU? I know you want to allocate the
> entire data buffer
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I applied already the patches I thought were appropriate,
> you had some crypto layer changes that you need to work
> out with Herbert Xu before the rest can be applied.
Should the rest of it go via Andrew's tree then?
David
-
To unsubscribe from this li
Aubrey Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The patch works properly on my side. But
> 1) I'm not sure why you re-wrote alloc/free_pg_vec function, doesn't
> the current implement work for NOMMU? I know you want to allocate the
> entire data buffer as one contiguous lump, but is it really necessary?
Y
73 matches
Mail list logo
