Considering that NET_CLS_POLICE has been marked as obsolete for more
than one year, would a patch to remove it be acceptable?
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promi
This patch removes the following unused EXPORT_SYMBOL's:
- sch_api.c: qdisc_lookup
- sch_generic.c: __netdev_watchdog_up
- sch_generic.c: noop_qdisc_ops
- sch_generic.c: qdisc_alloc
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/sched/sch_api.c |1 -
net/sched/sch_generic.c |
On Saturday 25 November 2006 11:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Saturday, 25. November 2006 06:39, you wrote:
> > Ok, it looks like the patch changed the order of netdevice registration vs.
> > requesting firmware. My scripts are trying to set ESSID and keys before
> > firmware even gets loaded i
Larry Finger wrote:
In the scan section of ieee80211softmac, network transmits are disabled.
Clearly, this does not make any sense as transmit is necessary for active
scanning, and transmits are not used when passive scanning.
Probe request frames are generated by softmac and do not go through
This patch moves the EXPORT_SYMBOL's from net/rxrpc/rxrpc_syms.c to the
files with the actual functions.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/rxrpc/Makefile |1 -
net/rxrpc/call.c |5 +
net/rxrpc/connection.c |2 ++
net/rxrpc/rxrpc_syms.c | 34
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 18:31 -0800, dean gaudet wrote:
> but there's no gratuitous arp for any eth0:N aliased interfaces... and the
> cisco ARP cache on this ISP router seems to be set to a long timeout. i
> could reach eth0:N from local net, but couldn't get outside local net from
> eth0:N.
C
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
> dean gaudet wrote:
> > hi...
> >
> > i ran into some problems recently which would have been avoided if my box
> > did a gratuitous arp as it brought up all interfaces (the router took
> > forever to timeout the ARP entries for interface aliases
dean gaudet wrote:
hi...
i ran into some problems recently which would have been avoided if my box
did a gratuitous arp as it brought up all interfaces (the router took
forever to timeout the ARP entries for interface aliases). so i set about
looking to see why that wasn't happening.
i eit
Luca Tettamanti wrote:
Got the board, done some basic testing: so far so good :)
The controller also supports MSI and (at least with my chipset - G965)
it works fine:
218: 80649 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth1
which is nice, otherwise it ends up sharing the IRQ with SATA and USB.
I
This patch contains the following possible cleanups:
- make needlessly global functions static
- #if 0 the following unused global functions:
- zd_chip.c: zd_ioread16()
- zd_chip.c: zd_ioread32()
- zd_chip.c: zd_iowrite16()
- zd_chip.c: zd_ioread32v()
- zd_chip.c: zd_read_mac_addr()
- z
When scanning in debug mode, softmac is very chatty in that it puts 3 lines
in the logs for each time it scans. This patch has only one line containing
all the information previously reported.
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
John,
Please apply this to wireless-2.6.
Larry
I
From: Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In the scan section of ieee80211softmac, network transmits are disabled.
Clearly, this does not make any sense as transmit is necessary for active
scanning, and transmits are not used when passive scanning. In addition,
when SoftMAC re-enables transmits, it
hi...
i ran into some problems recently which would have been avoided if my box
did a gratuitous arp as it brought up all interfaces (the router took
forever to timeout the ARP entries for interface aliases). so i set about
looking to see why that wasn't happening.
i either missed it, or ther
"Leonid Grossman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I did not mean kernel bypass, just L2 hw channels that for
> all practical purposes act as separate NICs -
> different MAC addresses, no blocking, independent reset, etc.
Yes. Nearly all of what you need for safe kernel bypass.
>> In the worst ca
Hello,
Luca Tettamanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> Chris Snook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
>>
>> I've been working on this with Jay since his initial submission. Thanks
>> to everyone who has provided feedback on the resubmit. We're currently
>> quite short on actual testers, since
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric W. Biederman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2006 11:27 AM
> To: Leonid Grossman
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Daniel Lezcano; Dmitry Mishin; Stephen
> Hemminger; netdev@vger.kernel.org; Linux Containers
> Subject: Re: Network virtu
16 matches
Mail list logo