[ETHTOOL]: Fix UFO typo

2006-06-15 Thread Herbert Xu
Hi Dave: [ETHTOOL]: Fix UFO typo The function ethtool_get_ufo was referring to ETHTOOL_GTSO instead of ETHTOOL_GUFO. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apa

Re: PATCHv3 2.6.17-rc5 tulip free_irq() called too late

2006-06-15 Thread Grant Grundler
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 10:30:17PM +0200, Francois Romieu wrote: > Afaik free_irq() on a shared irq does not touch the hardware and > irqs are anything but synchronous. If free_irq() is issued before > the device is idle and its irq are not acked, it's wrong. Correct. Before calling free_irq(), pa

Re: [Ubuntu PATCH] Broadcom wireless patch, PCIE/Mactel support

2006-06-15 Thread Randy Dunlap
Arjan van de Ven wrote: On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 16:22 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: From: Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Broadcom wireless patch, PCIE/Mactel support http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/bcollins/ubuntu-dapper.git;a=commitdiff;h=1373a8487e911b5ee204f4422ddea00929c8a4cc

Re: [RFC] [patch 0/6] [Network namespace] introduction

2006-06-15 Thread Eric W. Biederman
My apologies for not looking at this earlier I had an email hickup so I'm having to recreate the context from email archives, and you didn't copy me. Have you seen my previous work in this direction? I know I had a much much more complete implementation. The only part I had not completed was ip

Re: [Ubuntu PATCH] Broadcom wireless patch, PCIE/Mactel support

2006-06-15 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 16:22 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > From: Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Broadcom wireless patch, PCIE/Mactel support > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/bcollins/ubuntu-dapper.git;a=commitdiff;h=1373a8487e911b5ee204f4422ddea00929c8a4cc > > This patch

Question: Virtual device error return is mangled

2006-06-15 Thread Mark Huth
Why does net/core/dev.c: dev_queue_transmit not pass back the actual status from hard_start_xmit in the case of a virtual device, and why is an error return considered a critical kernel error? ie why: if (!dev->hard_start_xmit(skb, dev)) { ... rc = -ENETDOWN;

[PATCH 2/6][SCTP]: Reject sctp packets with broadcast addresses.

2006-06-15 Thread Sridhar Samudrala
[SCTP]: Reject sctp packets with broadcast addresses. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/net/sctp/structs.h |3 ++- net/sctp/input.c |3 ++- net/sctp/ipv6.c|6 -- net/sctp/protoc

[PATCH 1/6][SCTP]: Limit association max_retrans setting in setsockopt

2006-06-15 Thread Sridhar Samudrala
Dave, Please apply the following 6 SCTP patches to 2.6 tree. Thanks Sridhar - [SCTP]: Limit association max_retrans setting in setsockopt. When using ASSOCINFO socket option, we need to limit the number of maximum association re

[PATCH 3/6][SCTP] Reset rtt_in_progress for the chunk when processing its sack.

2006-06-15 Thread Sridhar Samudrala
[SCTP] Reset rtt_in_progress for the chunk when processing its sack. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/net/sctp/sctp.h |2 +- net/sctp/outqueue.c |1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff

[PATCH 5/6][SCTP]: Send only 1 window update SACK per message.

2006-06-15 Thread Sridhar Samudrala
[SCTP]: Send only 1 window update SACK per message. Right now, every time we increase our rwnd by more then MTU bytes, we trigger a SACK. When processing large messages, this will generate a SACK for almost every other SCTP fragment. However since we are freeing the entire message at the same tim

[PATCH 4/6][SCTP]: Don't do CRC32C checksum over loopback.

2006-06-15 Thread Sridhar Samudrala
[SCTP]: Don't do CRC32C checksum over loopback. Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- net/sctp/input.c |3 ++- net/sctp/output.c | 48 +++- 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/sctp/input.c b/n

[PATCH 6/6][SCTP]: Fix persistent slowdown in sctp when a gap ack consumes rx buffer.

2006-06-15 Thread Sridhar Samudrala
[SCTP]: Fix persistent slowdown in sctp when a gap ack consumes rx buffer. In the event that our entire receive buffer is full with a series of chunks that represent a single gap-ack, and then we accept a chunk (or chunks) that fill in the gap between the ctsn and the first gap, we renege chunks f

Re: SO_REUSEPORT and multicasting

2006-06-15 Thread David Stevens
If you can send me (or post) the program, I may be able to help. +-DLS - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

RE: [openib-general] [PATCH v2 1/7] AMSO1100 Low Level Driver.

2006-06-15 Thread Steve Wise
> > Now that I've looked more into this, I'm not sure there's a > > simple way for the IWCM to copy the pdata on the upcall. > > Currently, the IWCM's event upcall, cm_event_handler(), > > simply queues the work for processing on a workqueue thread. > > So there's no per-event logic at all there. >

RE: [openib-general] [PATCH v2 1/7] AMSO1100 Low Level Driver.

2006-06-15 Thread Caitlin Bestler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 08:41 -0500, Steve Wise wrote: >> On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 20:35 -0500, Bob Sharp wrote: >> +void c2_ae_event(struct c2_dev *c2dev, u32 mq_index) { + >> >> >> + case C2_RES_IND_EP:{ + + struct c2wr_ae_connection_re

Re: skge wake on lan failing

2006-06-15 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 22:10:26 +0100 Sitsofe Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > We have a bunch of PCI D-Link System Inc DGE-530T Gigabit Ethernet cards > which use the skge driver. However, the link light for a given card goes > off at the switch during a suspend to ram or power down

Pull request for 'upstream' branch

2006-06-15 Thread Francois Romieu
Please pull from branch 'upstream' to get the change below: git://electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com/home/romieu/linux-2.6.git Patch applies both to jeff#upstream and jeff#upstream-fixes Shortlog Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia: sundance: PCI ID for ip100a Patch - diff --git a/driv

What's new in wireless-dev?

2006-06-15 Thread John W. Linville
The following changes since commit bff7c0afa5a40acf518ae9fbf67e5f93ff9107bc: John W. Linville: Merge branch 'from-linus' are found in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-dev.git Jiri Benc: d80211: deinit sysfs in case of an err

Re: [patch] workaround zd1201 interference problem

2006-06-15 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > Pavel Machek wrote: > >if you plug zd1201 into USB, it starts jamming radio, > >immediately. Enable/disable, or iwlist wlan0 scan, or basically any > >operation unjams the radio. This patch works it around: > > Can we be any more specific? > > At which precise point does the interference s

Re: [2/2] [BRIDGE]: Add support for NETIF_F_HW_CSUM devices

2006-06-15 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 21:25:43 +1000 Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi: > > [BRIDGE]: Add support for NETIF_F_HW_CSUM devices > > As it is the bridge will only ever declare NETIF_F_IP_CSUM even if all > its constituent devices support NETIF_F_HW_CSUM. This patch fixes this > by supportin

Re: Suspending 802.11 drivers

2006-06-15 Thread Michael Buesch
On Thursday 15 June 2006 22:12, Florian Fainelli wrote: > Hello Michael, > > I think these are really interesting functions. Currently I scripted a bit to > do module unloading/loading on suspend/resume requests plus supplicant > context saving and restart. > > Of course, if the driver is able

Re: [patch] workaround zd1201 interference problem

2006-06-15 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > Which operation is the one which stops the interference, the enable or > > > the disable? > > > > Disable alone was not enough to stop interference. > > I'm going to drop this patch for now, in the hopes that with Daniel's > ZyDas contacts you can devise a more palatable solution. I'

Re: [PATCH 1/2] e1000: fix netpoll with NAPI

2006-06-15 Thread Mitch Williams
Andy Grover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is the guy. I'm not sure when he'll be working on this; it's somewhere in his TODO pile. On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, John W. Linville wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 04:44:56PM -0700, Mitch Williams wrote: > > > One of our engineers (on the I/O AT team) has been taske

Re: [PATCH 5/5] bcm43xx-d80211: fix sending of fragments

2006-06-15 Thread Michael Buesch
On Thursday 15 June 2006 22:27, Jiri Benc wrote: > Thu, 15 Jun 2006 18:55:11 +0200, Michael Buesch pise: > > Please also merge the other patch. It is too hard to figure out > > the dependencies for me now. So simply merge it and I will submit > > a fixup patch later, after you pushed it out. > > Th

Re: PATCHv3 2.6.17-rc5 tulip free_irq() called too late

2006-06-15 Thread Francois Romieu
Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : [shared irq] > I thought we've worked through that already: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg05902.html > > Patch v3 takes care of that problem. > The first step in the sequence is to mask IRQs on the tulip. > The "neighbor" device sharing the IRQ

Re: [PATCH 5/5] bcm43xx-d80211: fix sending of fragments

2006-06-15 Thread Jiri Benc
Thu, 15 Jun 2006 18:55:11 +0200, Michael Buesch pise: > Please also merge the other patch. It is too hard to figure out > the dependencies for me now. So simply merge it and I will submit > a fixup patch later, after you pushed it out. > The Subject was: > [incomplete 2/5] bcm43xx-d80211: per-queue

Re: Suspending 802.11 drivers

2006-06-15 Thread Ivo van Doorn
Hi, > I am currently thinking about the best way to correctly > implement PM suspending for wireless drivers. > Currently, the 802.11 stack is not suspend aware (if I talk > about "stack" here, I mostly mean devicescape). > For example, if we suspend the bcm43xx driver, we don't > notify the stack

Re: [patch] workaround zd1201 interference problem

2006-06-15 Thread John W. Linville
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 12:38:04AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Which operation is the one which stops the interference, the enable or > > the disable? > > Disable alone was not enough to stop interference. I'm going to drop this patch for now, in the hopes that with Daniel's ZyDas contacts y

Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6] Remove Prism II support from Orinoco

2006-06-15 Thread John W. Linville
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 08:15:10AM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote: > Regarding the disabling of IDs, I could prepare a patch for orinoco_cs > that would disable Prism2 support via a configuration option. Would that > be helpful/acceptable? I'm going to 'officially' drop this patch, while you and P

Please pull 'upstream' branch of wireless-2.6

2006-06-15 Thread John W. Linville
The following changes since commit 76df73ff90e99681a99e457aec4cfe0a240b7982: John W. Linville: Merge branch 'from-linus' into upstream are found in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-2.6.git upstream Jiri Slaby: pci: bcm43xx

Suspending 802.11 drivers

2006-06-15 Thread Michael Buesch
Hi, I am currently thinking about the best way to correctly implement PM suspending for wireless drivers. Currently, the 802.11 stack is not suspend aware (if I talk about "stack" here, I mostly mean devicescape). For example, if we suspend the bcm43xx driver, we don't notify the stack before doin

Re: [PATCH] s2io: netpoll support

2006-06-15 Thread Brian Haley
This adds netpoll support for things like netconsole/kgdboe to the s2io 10GbE driver. Signed-off-by: Brian Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/drivers/net/s2io.c b/drivers/net/s2io.c index 79208f4..f2b8dba 100644 --- a/drivers/net/s2io.c +++ b/drivers/net/s2io.c @@ -2575,6 +2575,50 @@ no_rx:

Re: [PATCH 5/5] bcm43xx-d80211: fix sending of fragments

2006-06-15 Thread Michael Buesch
On Monday 12 June 2006 21:35, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Monday 12 June 2006 21:16, Jiri Benc wrote: > > This makes fragmentation work with bcm43xx. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The other patch will get my sign-off

[BUG] HTB panic

2006-06-15 Thread Stephen Hemminger
Could some one who has used HTB fix this bug? Looks like a simple use after free. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6681 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordo

Re: [Ubuntu PATCH] Broadcom wireless patch, PCIE/Mactel support

2006-06-15 Thread Randy Dunlap
Stefano Brivio wrote: On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 16:22:39 -0700 Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Broadcom wireless patch, PCIE/Mactel support http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/bcollins/ubuntu-dapper.git;a=commitdiff;h=1373a8487e911b5ee204f

Re: [Ubuntu PATCH] Broadcom wireless patch, PCIE/Mactel support

2006-06-15 Thread Michael Buesch
On Thursday 15 June 2006 13:32, Stefano Brivio wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 16:22:39 -0700 > Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > From: Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Broadcom wireless patch, PCIE/Mactel support > > > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/bcollins

Re: [PATCH] Make in-kernel hostap less annoying

2006-06-15 Thread Dan Williams
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 20:41 -0700, Jouni Malinen wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 03:13:02PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote: > > > Most user don't want their kern.log/dmesg filled with > > debugging gibberish, and could turn it on if prompted. > > > > ( Example: > > wifi0: TXEXC - status=0x0004 ([Di

RE: [openib-general] [PATCH v2 1/7] AMSO1100 Low Level Driver.

2006-06-15 Thread Steve Wise
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 08:41 -0500, Steve Wise wrote: > On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 20:35 -0500, Bob Sharp wrote: > > > > +void c2_ae_event(struct c2_dev *c2dev, u32 mq_index) > > > +{ > > > + > > > > > > + case C2_RES_IND_EP:{ > > > + > > > + struct c2wr_ae_connection_request *req = > > > +

RE: [openib-general] [PATCH v2 1/7] AMSO1100 Low Level Driver.

2006-06-15 Thread Steve Wise
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 20:35 -0500, Bob Sharp wrote: > > +void c2_ae_event(struct c2_dev *c2dev, u32 mq_index) > > +{ > > + > > + case C2_RES_IND_EP:{ > > + > > + struct c2wr_ae_connection_request *req = > > + &wr->ae.ae_connection_request; > > + struct iw

SO_REUSEPORT and multicasting

2006-06-15 Thread Jason
Hello, I wrote a program that uses multicasting to send data. It works great on HP-UX but does not work on Fedora Core 5. I emailed the fedora list but they were of little to no help. Does the kernel support SO_REUSEPORT? If so can anyone give me some suggestions why my program does not work

Re: [PATCH 0/2] NET: Accurate packet scheduling for ATM/ADSL

2006-06-15 Thread jamal
On Wed, 2006-14-06 at 14:55 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 08:06 -0400, jamal wrote: > > - Have you tried to do a long-lived session such as a large FTP and > > seen how far off the deviation was? That would provide some interesting > > data point. > > The deviation

Re: [PATCH 2/2] NET: Accurate packet scheduling for ATM/ADSL (userspace)

2006-06-15 Thread jamal
On Thu, 2006-15-06 at 10:47 +1000, Russell Stuart wrote: > On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 11:57 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > The other problem I see with this code is it is very tightly tied to ATM > > cell sizes, not to solving the generic question of packetisation. > > Others have made this point also. I

Re: [PATCH 0/2] NET: Accurate packet scheduling for ATM/ADSL

2006-06-15 Thread jamal
On Wed, 2006-14-06 at 14:55 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 08:06 -0400, jamal wrote: > > - Have you tried to do a long-lived session such as a large FTP and > > seen how far off the deviation was? That would provide some interesting > > data point. > > The deviation

Re: [PATCH 1/2] e1000: fix netpoll with NAPI

2006-06-15 Thread John W. Linville
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 04:44:56PM -0700, Mitch Williams wrote: > One of our engineers (on the I/O AT team) has been tasked with modifying > the Linux kernel to properly support multiple hardware queues (both TX and > RX). We'll make sure that he looks at the netpoll interface as part of > that p

Re: [Ubuntu PATCH] Broadcom wireless patch, PCIE/Mactel support

2006-06-15 Thread Stefano Brivio
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 16:22:39 -0700 Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Broadcom wireless patch, PCIE/Mactel support > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/bcollins/ubuntu-dapper.git;a=commitdiff;h=1373a8487e911b5ee204f4422ddea00929c8

Re: [patch] ipv4: fix lock usage in udp_ioctl

2006-06-15 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Heiko Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about the patch below? The warning goes away and I assume > "tmp_list" needs lockdep_reinit_key too, since it should have the same > locking rules as the rest of qeth's skb-queue management. yeah, looks good. Ingo - To unsubscribe from

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Runtime configuration of HTB's HYSTERESIS option

2006-06-15 Thread Martin Devera
Russell Stuart wrote: The HTB qdisc has a compile time option, HTB_HYSTERESIS, that trades accuracy of traffic classification for CPU time. These patches change hysteresis to be a runtime option under the control of "tc". The effects of HYSTERESIS on HTB's accuracy are significant (see chap

Re: driver for pptp

2006-06-15 Thread xeb
Thanks for critique. >Please read Documentation/SubmittingPatches (and CodingStyle) and submit your >kernel patch to netdev. OK. >1) why wasn't it possible to use the PPPoX infrastructure of the kernel which >is already being used by PPPoE ? Or at least model it somehow similar to the >exis

[PATCH 2/2] Runtime configuration of HTB's HYSTERESIS option (userspace)

2006-06-15 Thread Russell Stuart
The HTB qdisc has a compile time option, HTB_HYSTERESIS, that trades accuracy of traffic classification for CPU time. These patches change hysteresis to be a runtime option under the control of "tc". The effects of HYSTERESIS on HTB's accuracy are significant (see chapter 7, section 7.3.1, pp

[PATCH 0/2] Runtime configuration of HTB's HYSTERESIS option

2006-06-15 Thread Russell Stuart
The HTB qdisc has a compile time option, HTB_HYSTERESIS, that trades accuracy of traffic classification for CPU time. These patches change hysteresis to be a runtime option under the control of "tc". The effects of HYSTERESIS on HTB's accuracy are significant (see chapter 7, section 7.3.1, pp

[PATCH 1/2] Runtime configuration of HTB's HYSTERESIS option (kernel)

2006-06-15 Thread Russell Stuart
The HTB qdisc has a compile time option, HTB_HYSTERESIS, that trades accuracy of traffic classification for CPU time. These patches change hysteresis to be a runtime option under the control of "tc". The effects of HYSTERESIS on HTB's accuracy are significant (see chapter 7, section 7.3.1, pp