From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 19:33:21 +0400
> Does SELinux have security handlers for each type of possible ioctls
> over the world? Each ioctl number is like each netlink type of message,
> but instead there is only one check per ioctl syscall as long as lsm
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Kho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 6:22 AM
> To: #ZHOU BIN#
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] TCP Veno module for kernel 2.6.16.13
>
>
> On 5/24/06, #ZHOU BIN# <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> GRE keys are 16-bit wide.
This looks harmless, so I've queued it for 2.6.18. Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 5/24/06, #ZHOU BIN# <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+ u16 cntRTT; /* # of RTTs measured within last RTT */
+ /* veno->cntRTT = 0; */
It looks like this counter is never initialized, and the comment is deceiving.
Thomas Kho
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Francois Romieu wrote:
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
ACK, but patch won't apply:
I have regenerated it against mainline. It can be pulled from the repository
git://electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com/home/romieu/linux-2.6.git velocity
pulled, thanks
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 09:04:09AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> What is the interrupt assignment on this machine?
> cat /proc/interrupts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0
0: 250325IO-APIC-edge timer
1:386IO-APIC-edge i8042
8:
On Sun, 28 May 2006 07:43:10 +
Aravind Gottipati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 02:10:17PM -0700, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> > What kind of poor performance? what test? please send the output of
> > ethtool -e ethX and ethtool -S ethX after you've been having problems.
>
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 01:21:05PM -0400, James Morris ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Sat, 27 May 2006, James Morris wrote:
>
> > One of the problems is that different Netlink protocols bury their
> > commands at different levels, so the SELinux code has to know how how deep
> > to dig (and th
On Sun, 28 May 2006, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> ieee80211: eth1: Unknown management packet: 112
a small addendum: below is the function from the original driver, where
they process management packets. Although they don't have special
processing for 0x70, they seem to be doing lots of stuff
Hi all
Using the zd1211rw driver on a ppc under Sarge, 2.6.17-rc2 with some
ieee80211 / softmac patches I get
ieee80211: eth1: Unknown management packet: 112
and then the connection was broken:-( What is the 0x70 packet? Have been
using the original zd1211 vendor-based driver before, probably,
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Sat, 27 May 2006 23:03:02 -0700 (PDT)),
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> > Please don't get me wrong. What I removed here doesn't work at all to
> > begin with. I was just pointing out the possible reason why this code
> > existed in the first place.
>
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 02:10:17PM -0700, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> What kind of poor performance? what test? please send the output of
> ethtool -e ethX and ethtool -S ethX after you've been having problems.
I first noticed the problem (slow speed) when pinging sites. I then
noticed that the pr
On Fri, 26 May 2006 15:59:00 -0400
"John W. Linville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone have anything else they are holding-back for 2.6.18?
We would like to get PCI-E support patchset into bcm43xx driver as well,
but we are still testing it. I hope we'll be ready in a few days.
--
Ciao
Stefa
13 matches
Mail list logo
