Re: git-net warnings

From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 23:28:33 -0800 > Badness in sk_del_node_init at include/net/sock.h:330 > > Call Trace:{local_bh_enable+119} > {__unix_remove_socket+98} >{unix_release_sock+57} > {unix_release+33} >{sock_release+27} {sock_close+55} >

Re: git-net warnings

It gets uglier. This is with just 2.6.15-rc5, linus.patch and git-net.patch, btw: We get a slab scribble. ppc64 and x86 seem OK. For some reason, x86_64 doesn't like it. Starting pcmcia: [ OK ] Setting network parameters: general protection fault: [1] <3>Slab corrupt2 Redzone: 0x5a

git-net warnings

This is from my x86_64 box's boot output: Badness in sk_del_node_init at include/net/sock.h:330 Call Trace:{local_bh_enable+119} {__unix_remove_socket+98} {unix_release_sock+57} {unix_release+33} {sock_release+27} {sock_close+55} {__fput+195} {fput+21} {filp_close+

Re: PROBLEM: bug in e1000 module causes very high CPU load

On 12/10/05, ph0x <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [1.] One line summary of the problem: bug in e1000 (ksoftirqd eats all CPU) > [2.] Full description of the problem/report: > > After a while of using the network (uptime is 15 days now..) it suddenly > goes below expected performance. Even tho the util

[PATCH] forcedeth TSO fix for large buffers

This patch contains a bug fix for large buffers. Originally, if a tx buffer to be sent was larger then the maximum size of the tx descriptor, it would overwrite other control bits. In this patch, the buffer is split over multiple descriptors. Also, the fragments are now setup in forward order.

Re: [PATCH 6/6][IPV6]: Export ipv6_opt_accepted

All 6 patches applied and pushed to net-2.6.16 Thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH] avoid atomic xchg() for non-error case

From: Benjamin LaHaise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 10:58:13 -0500 > On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 03:50:52PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > > Can you toss together such a patch or would you like me to do it? :-) > > Sure, it looks like there were 2 places where the test on sk_err was >

[PATCH 6/6][IPV6]: Export ipv6_opt_accepted

Hi David, Please consider pulling from: master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/net-2.6.16.git Best Regards, - Arnaldo tree a47e827887f6af53382373476e58a3dde8418c22 parent 273cab383a9bf4c564e11f0fc2c5bd07f394d76c author Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1134242431 -0200

[PATCH 3/6][IPV6]: Export some symbols for DCCPv6

Hi David, Please consider pulling from: master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/net-2.6.16.git Best Regards, - Arnaldo tree cf4a4fc231acd6967b29a1a6002719ea36288063 parent 997f378c6a3d3b034717ad814da0517ab58c457e author Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1134240390 -0200

[PATCH 5/6][DCCP]: Prepare the AF agnostic core for the introduction of DCCPv

Hi David, Please consider pulling from: master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/net-2.6.16.git Best Regards, - Arnaldo tree 174dd0e88a564eee13135f82726dff9b7cf47ab5 parent cb79764656d2a8308dc7705447f1ea92edc0a297 author Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1134242069 -0200

[PATCH 4/6][DCCP]: Just rename dccp_v4_prot to dccp_prot

Hi David, Please consider pulling from: master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/net-2.6.16.git Best Regards, - Arnaldo tree 36f553f750bd064cb81e741810caf5663b52bc1b parent c2cb719caa3b4ebc11fcec9f3da2739a285edaf4 author Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1134240751 -0200

[PATCH 2/6][IPV6]: Introduce inet6_timewait_sock

Hi David, Please consider pulling from: master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/net-2.6.16.git Best Regards, - Arnaldo tree 3ad2b6c48ae4e3379dddc44542fb035a7067eb97 parent 69ecece64af68def2d0480bf6f2a1448508b2860 author Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1134237495 -0200

[PATCH 1/6][IPV6]: Generalise some functions

Hi David, Please consider pulling from: master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/net-2.6.16.git Later today I'll try and continue sending the rest of the changesets finishing this phase, getting my initial DCCPv6 implementation in the tree. Best Regards, - Arnaldo tree b0c2bc5b39fe

Re: [RFC] ip / ifconfig redesign

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi. >>And there may be many other benefits... (i.e. 100% OSI compliance) >> > > What does Open Source Initiative have to do with this at all??? > You are just spewing stuff out. *cough* http://www.webopedia.com/quick_ref/OSI_Layers.asp He's talkin

Re: [PATCH] avoid atomic xchg() for non-error case

On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 03:50:52PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > Can you toss together such a patch or would you like me to do it? :-) Sure, it looks like there were 2 places where the test on sk_err was missing from the event wait logic (in sk_stream_wait_connect and sk_stream_wait_memory), w