From: Feyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 07:43:10 +0200
> can I assume that hard_start_xmit will always get skbs with hard_header_len
> reserved? I need two more bytes at the start of the packet and I'm getting
> spurious panics in skb_push.
Typically, no. ->hard_start_xmit() has a
Hi,
can I assume that hard_start_xmit will always get skbs with hard_header_len
reserved? I need two more bytes at the start of the packet and I'm getting
spurious panics in skb_push.
Feyd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTE
Ok, I went a little bananas with the diagrams, but here
goes nothing :-)
http://vger.kernel.org/~davem/tcp_output.html
it's linked from my top-level page as well.
Enjoy.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mor
the following list of files still use cli(). Are all of these still in
use?
The eventual goal is I'd like to remove the unused drivers and fix the
others.
drivers/net/wan/sdla_x25.c
drivers/net/cris/eth_v10.c
drivers/net/irda/ep7211_ir.c
drivers/net/fec.c
drivers/net/tulip/xircom_tulip_cb.c
dri
I've updated the SKB tutorial a little bit today, in particular
I added coverage of non-linear data areas to the SKB data
handling tutorial page at:
http://vger.kernel.org/~davem/skb_data.html
I'll probably start working on the TCP packet output engine
next.
-
To unsubscribe from this l
Herbert Xu wrote:
> Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Linux does use the new SA when looking it up again, but it caches the
>>resolved bundles until an SA expires or is deleted. You could change
>>racoon to remove the old SA and thus behave similar to Cisco, but this
>>is wrong for mu
Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Linux does use the new SA when looking it up again, but it caches the
> resolved bundles until an SA expires or is deleted. You could change
> racoon to remove the old SA and thus behave similar to Cisco, but this
> is wrong for multiple reasons. The
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 01:14:26PM -0700, Arthur Kepner wrote:
>
> Version 2 of the rfc/patch is attached. It has been changed
> as indicated in the commentary below.
Thanks for the update Arthur. I'll have a think about this and
respond to you after netconf/LKS.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at
