On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
> Check if anyone stars the server manually like I think Akonadi did or
> maybe they still do...
Well, I've removed that code rather recently. I still need to merge it
though.
It was super annoying. Everytime I would switch off Nepomuk for
Check if anyone stars the server manually like I think Akonadi did or
maybe they still do...
On 03/21/2013 04:33 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Simeon Bird mailto:bla...@gmail.com>> wrote:
What happens if it is different? I guess the servicecontrol function
@Trueg: Any comments?
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Jörg Ehrichs wrote:
> >
> > Lets see if anyone else has an opinion. I'm worried that everyone might
> > already be used to calling the nepomuksever and I'll be breaking some
> stuff.
> > Though people should be using nepomukctl now.
> >
>
>
>
> Lets see if anyone else has an opinion. I'm worried that everyone might
> already be used to calling the nepomuksever and I'll be breaking some stuff.
> Though people should be using nepomukctl now.
>
I'd say rename it, especially if nepomukctl is the new way, so people know that
they should u
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Simeon Bird wrote:
> What happens if it is different? I guess the servicecontrol function
> just returns the wrong thing?
>
well, the service won't start then. I can probably add a proper debug
message.
I wonder how the Akonadi people deal with this.
>
> >> >
> Just pushed.
Thanks - it all seems to work for me now.
>> >> >> Problems -
>> >> >> 1. I've kinda broken the /servicecontrol name and description
>> >> >> functions.
>> >> >> Implementing this would require parsing the desktop files, which I
>> >> >> still
>> >> >> haven't done.
>> >
>> >
>> >
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Simeon Bird wrote:
> >
> >> 2) nepomukctl needs updating.
> >
> >
> > fixed
>
> Thanks - did you push already?
>
Just pushed.
>
> >> >> Problems -
> >> >> 1. I've kinda broken the /servicecontrol name and description
> >> >> functions.
> >> >> Implementing thi
>> Only things that broke are:
>> 1) the kcm and nepomukcontroller didn't recognise the file indexing
>> service anymore
>
>
> fixed.
>
>>
>> 2) nepomukctl needs updating.
>
>
> fixed
Thanks - did you push already?
>> >> Problems -
>> >> 1. I've kinda broken the /servicecontrol name and descripti
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Simeon Bird wrote:
> Hey Vishesh,
>
> I took a look at this this evening - it all looks fine and works as
> expected for me.
> And it is plainly a good idea :).
> The code looks good to me too, so consider this my "ship it!".
>
> Only things that broke are:
> 1) t
Hey Vishesh,
I took a look at this this evening - it all looks fine and works as
expected for me.
And it is plainly a good idea :).
The code looks good to me too, so consider this my "ship it!".
Only things that broke are:
1) the kcm and nepomukcontroller didn't recognise the file indexing
servic
Hey Vishesh,
Cool! This sounds like an excellent idea - I'll add looking at the
code to my todo list :)
Simeon
On 10 March 2013 14:08, Vishesh Handa wrote:
> Hey Simeon
>
> I've been meaning to implement a Nepomuk::Service2 class which would serve
> as an upgrade from the normal Service class.
Hey Simeon
I've been meaning to implement a Nepomuk::Service2 class which would serve
as an upgrade from the normal Service class. Given the problems we were
having with properly shutting down the storage service, I decided to
implement it. It's currently in the feature/service2 branch in nepomuk-
12 matches
Mail list logo
