Re: [Nepomuk] Music issues I want to fix

Because I'm talking about speed and performance the unnecessary parts don't bothers and don't affect to the performance of a DB. You can have a structure like SDO but if you don't use some parts it's not consuming resources, except a very little bit amount of memory and disk space not relevant in t

Re: [Nepomuk] Music issues I want to fix

What sort of build system is being used? Wouldn't it be possible to have a "lightweight" profile that is specified when the build is configured in order to exclude unnecessary parts? -Todd On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Ignacio Serantes wrote: > A light-weight DB is not obtained with a light-

Re: [Nepomuk] Music issues I want to fix

A light-weight DB is not obtained with a light-weight version of SDO. Maybe Tracker developers are not a DB developers and don't know this. On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:01 PM, logic.cpp wrote: > I think they are generally trying to develop a light-weight solution (for > Nokia / Maemo or whatever) a

Re: [Nepomuk] Music issues I want to fix

I think they are generally trying to develop a light-weight solution (for Nokia / Maemo or whatever) and as such are only using a light-weight version of current RDF ontologies, and they're also creating some custom properties just for their purposes to make things short-n-sweet-n-lightweight.

Re: [Nepomuk] Music issues I want to fix

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Ignacio Serantes wrote: > I hope they had a good reasons to did it because sounds totally stupid and > selfish. :D > > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Ignacio Serantes wrote: >> >>> I though

Re: [Nepomuk] Music issues I want to fix

I hope they had a good reasons to did it because sounds totally stupid and selfish. On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Ignacio Serantes wrote: > >> I thought that there is only one version of this stuff and it's a >> surprise discover ot

Re: [Nepomuk] Music issues I want to fix

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Ignacio Serantes wrote: > I thought that there is only one version of this stuff and it's a surprise > discover other version. Are there more?, all groups are sharing efforts? There is the tracker version, but they don't contribute back. They have basically fork

Re: [Nepomuk] Music issues I want to fix

I thought that there is only one version of this stuff and it's a surprise discover other version. Are there more?, all groups are sharing efforts? On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > >> better add the ticket. Eve

Re: [Nepomuk] Music issues I want to fix

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > better add the ticket. Even if there will be no more discussion. Back in > the beginning we decided to let every change go through a ticket... Btw, tracker have added those 2 exact properties in their version of SDO. For more than a year.

Re: [Nepomuk] Music issues I want to fix

On 06/13/2012 10:59 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Sebastian Trüg mailto:tr...@kde.org>> wrote: better add the ticket. Even if there will be no more discussion. Back in the beginning we decided to let every change go through a ticket... Btw, tracker hav

Re: [Nepomuk] Music issues I want to fix

better add the ticket. Even if there will be no more discussion. Back in the beginning we decided to let every change go through a ticket... On 06/13/2012 10:30 PM, Ignacio Serantes wrote: Two versions are good to me. Then what's next? May I add the ticket with nmm:albumArtist and nmm:albumProd

Re: [Nepomuk] Music issues I want to fix

Two versions are good to me. Then what's next? May I add the ticket with nmm:albumArtist and nmm:albumProducer or it's unnecessary as you are the maintainer? On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > On 06/13/2012 04:00 PM, Ignacio Serantes wrote: > >> Well, I forgot classic musi

Re: [Nepomuk] Music issues I want to fix

On 06/13/2012 04:00 PM, Ignacio Serantes wrote: Well, I forgot classic music so I was wrong :P. nmm:albumPerformer, with a cardinality 0:n is totally right. It's not handled by id3 tags but for classic music is in several cases the main difference between two music albums. I can, however, see

Re: [Nepomuk] Music issues I want to fix

Well, I forgot classic music so I was wrong :P. nmm:albumPerformer, with a cardinality 0:n is totally right. It's not handled by id3 tags but for classic music is in several cases the main difference between two music albums. On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Ignacio Serantes wrote: > > > On We

Re: [Nepomuk] Music issues I want to fix

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > On 06/13/2012 11:04 AM, Ignacio Serantes wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Sebastian Trüg > > wrote: >> >>On 06/10/2012 08:32 PM, Ignacio Serantes wrote: >> >>I brief update stat

Re: [Nepomuk] Music issues I want to fix

On 06/13/2012 11:04 AM, Ignacio Serantes wrote: Hi, On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Sebastian Trüg mailto:sebast...@trueg.de>> wrote: On 06/10/2012 08:32 PM, Ignacio Serantes wrote: I brief update status. 1) I just fix multiple performers bug in flac analyzer. 2

Re: [Nepomuk] Music issues I want to fix

Hi, On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > On 06/10/2012 08:32 PM, Ignacio Serantes wrote: > >> I brief update status. >> >> 1) I just fix multiple performers bug in flac analyzer. >> >> 2) nmm:albumArtist seems to be related to DB structure and is not a >> coding bug. I just

Re: [Nepomuk] Music issues I want to fix

On 06/10/2012 08:32 PM, Ignacio Serantes wrote: I brief update status. 1) I just fix multiple performers bug in flac analyzer. 2) nmm:albumArtist seems to be related to DB structure and is not a coding bug. I just added nmm:albumArtist to SDO and now there is a nmm:albumArtist in nmm:MusicAlbum

Re: [Nepomuk] Music issues I want to fix

I brief update status. 1) I just fix multiple performers bug in flac analyzer. 2) nmm:albumArtist seems to be related to DB structure and is not a coding bug. I just added nmm:albumArtist to SDO and now there is a nmm:albumArtist in nmm:MusicAlbum. This is the code I added: nmm:albumArtist

[Nepomuk] Music issues I want to fix

Hi, I detect next issues with music albums scanning flac and mp3 formats: 1) Performers: - mp3: supports it but it wrongly adding nmm:albumArtist too and this must be related to nmm:MusicAlbum. - flac: only adds one performer, the last added to the file?. nmm:musicArtist it's not imp