Re: [Nepomuk] Get rid of the Graph Maintainer

2012-06-15 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > I would love to actually. > I had it removing dangling graphs all the time. But that might have been > related to a buggy Virtuoso snapshot. Not sure. > Having it in a separate tool - maybe a command line one - would be a good > idea. So,

Re: [Nepomuk] Get rid of the Graph Maintainer

2012-06-15 Thread Sebastian Trüg
I would love to actually. I had it removing dangling graphs all the time. But that might have been related to a buggy Virtuoso snapshot. Not sure. Having it in a separate tool - maybe a command line one - would be a good idea. On 06/15/2012 03:18 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: Hey Sebastian Is it

[Nepomuk] Get rid of the Graph Maintainer

2012-06-15 Thread Vishesh Handa
Hey Sebastian Is it okay if we get rid of the GraphMaintainer in the storage service? It routinely causes high cpu usage of virtuoso, and I've been getting a lot of complaints? What do you think? Maybe we can move it to a separate Nepomuk Data migration or optimization application? People can ru