On 05/01/2012 02:11 PM, David Narvaez wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
>> If there is still code not going through the Nepomuk frontend it must be
>> treated as a bug. All data manipulation has to go through
>> Nepomuk::Resource or the Nepomuk datamanagement API (add
nepomuk-core depends on kdelibs. So kdelibs cannot depend on
nepomuk-core. We would have to get rid of those dependencies in kdelibs.
But that should not be too hard.
On 05/03/2012 11:21 AM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
> I just noticed that this discussion is no longer cced to kcd.
>
> On Thu, May 3, 20
I just noticed that this discussion is no longer cced to kcd.
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Christian Mollekopf wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2012, at 02:22 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Christian Mollekopf > wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 03 May 2012 00.32:37 Vish
On Thu, May 3, 2012, at 02:22 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Christian Mollekopf
<[1]chrig...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> On Thursday 03 May 2012 00.32:37 Vishesh Handa wrote:
>
> Hey everyone!
>
Hey Vishesh,
Hey Christian
Glad your tackling this, it's indeed a
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Christian Mollekopf wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 May 2012 00.32:37 Vishesh Handa wrote:
> >
> > Hey everyone!
> >
> Hey Vishesh,
>
Hey Christian
>
> Glad your tackling this, it's indeed a rather painful situation.
>
> >
> > So, we need a solution.
> >
> > The first s
On 05/02/2012 11:39 PM, Christian Mollekopf wrote:
>> On Thursday 03 May 2012 00.32:37 Vishesh Handa wrote:
>>
>> Hey everyone!
>>
> Hey Vishesh,
>
> Glad your tackling this, it's indeed a rather painful situation.
>
>>
>> So, we need a solution.
>>
>> The first solution -
>> * Remove nepomuk fro
