Re: [Nepomuk] Review Request: nepomuk/services/storage/datamanagementmodel.h fix to allow compiling on apple's gcc 4.2.1

2011-10-05 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102753/#review7137 --- This review has been submitted with commit b8f67d82f4924eb6b2d2

Re: [Nepomuk] Review Request: nepomuk/services/storage/datamanagementmodel.h fix to allow compiling on apple's gcc 4.2.1

2011-10-05 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102753/#review7135 --- This review has been submitted with commit 7ff19a5e36189f8af640

Re: [Nepomuk] [Kde-pim] Who relies on Soprano::Model::statement[s]Added|Removed signals?

2011-10-05 Thread laurent Montel
Le Wednesday 5 October 2011 08:55:08 Volker Krause a écrit : > On Friday 30 September 2011 13:36:22 Sebastian Trüg wrote: > > Hi lists, > > > > with frameworks in the building and Nepomuk probably going that > > direction already for 4.8 I would like to clean up a bit. One of these > > cleanup tas

Re: [Nepomuk] Resources deletion

2011-10-05 Thread Sebastian Trüg
On 10/05/2011 04:56 PM, Ignacio Serantes wrote: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Sebastian Trüg > wrote: > > Fixed the crash. :) > > > Good to know so I assume that I was doing fine :). As I now know how to > download and compile nepomuk-core, a small step for a KDE d

Re: [Nepomuk] Resources deletion

2011-10-05 Thread Ignacio Serantes
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > Fixed the crash. :) > Good to know so I assume that I was doing fine :). As I now know how to download and compile nepomuk-core, a small step for a KDE developer but a really big one for me, I will try to improve my skills and try to help w

Re: [Nepomuk] Review Request: nepomuk/services/storage/datamanagementmodel.h fix to allow compiling on apple's gcc 4.2.1

2011-10-05 Thread Sebastian Trueg
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102753/#review7120 --- Ship it! I am fine with this. But maybe it would be cleaner to

Re: [Nepomuk] Resources deletion

2011-10-05 Thread Sebastian Trüg
Fixed the crash. :) On 10/04/2011 08:18 PM, Ignacio Serantes wrote: > I don't use a tarball. I follow the link in the message where you inform > about the fix and I done the next. > > git clone git://anongit.kde.org/nepomuk-core > > cd nepomuk-core > mkdir bu

Re: [Nepomuk] [Kde-pim] Who relies on Soprano::Model::statement[s]Added|Removed signals?

2011-10-05 Thread Vishesh Handa
Well now we know one of the reasons for Nepomuk hogging a lot of CPU. Those signals were horribly inefficient. On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:27 PM, laurent Montel wrote: > There is a HOWTO to explain how to convert it ? > > Nope. I could write one. I suppose. It seems fairly intuitive to me, but the

Re: [Nepomuk] Who relies on Soprano::Model::statement[s]Added|Removed signals?

2011-10-05 Thread Volker Krause
On Friday 30 September 2011 13:36:22 Sebastian Trüg wrote: > Hi lists, > > with frameworks in the building and Nepomuk probably going that > direction already for 4.8 I would like to clean up a bit. One of these > cleanup tasks targets the Soprano::Model statement signals. So far these > were the o