PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 1:26 AM
Subject: RE: [Nant-users] Replace Task in Nant
> Overall, I like the idea, but I'm wondering the utility/value of a set
of
> new tasks versus just invoking sed/awk/perl from an exec task ?
>
> - Ant
Duncan Godwin wrote:
We have the copy task so far, filtering would need to be added.
I seem to remember John Lam has implemented this for his own version of NAnt but I haven't seen the code anywhere. I just think where a parallel for similar functionality exists (in Ant) it should be used if p
uot;Daya Sharma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Duncan Godwin'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 8:18 PM
Subject: RE: [Nant-users] Replace Task in Nant
> Do we have Ant's Copy and Filters equivalent in Nant??
&
Do we have Ant's Copy and Filters equivalent in Nant??
-daya
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Duncan
Godwin
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 12:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Replace Task in Nant
I would argue
AIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 1:26 AM
Subject: RE: [Nant-users] Replace Task in Nant
> Overall, I like the idea, but I'm wondering the utility/value of a set of
> new tasks versus just invoking sed/awk/perl from an exec task ?
>
> - Ants
>
> | -Ori
s means
100% portability for now. If I had I could get rid of 50% of my
utility programs.
Jarek
- Original Message -
From: "Anthony LoveFrancisco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Jaroslaw Kowalski'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAI
ugust, 2003 13:48
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Replace Task in Nant
|
|
| Great idea. It would also be useful for updating assembly
| versions within daily builds. And because it's very easy to
| use regular expressions on .NET I sugge
Great idea. It would also be useful for updating assembly versions within
daily builds. And because it's very easy to use regular expressions on .NET
I suggest that we supported regexes in search patterns.
This way you could have:
I'm also thinking about using this task to i
