Bonio Lopez wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
>> What happens if you just make a change to p22? How would you rebuild it
>>
> without rebuilding the rest?
> I am sorry, but I don't understand where is the difference to the current
> approach. The nant will run over all projects and see that p1, p11,
Hi Gary,
>What happens if you just make a change to p22? How would you rebuild it
without rebuilding the rest?
I am sorry, but I don't understand where is the difference to the current
approach. The nant will run over all projects and see that p1, p11, p12,p13
are not changed. So it will not re
Bonio Lopez wrote:
> Hi Gary,
> Lets take a real example of my current project.
>
> Project with subprojects,
>
Let me be more specific. Are these .Net projects (i.e. C#, VB.Net,
etc.)? or something entirely different?
> p1, p11, p12, p13, p21, p22, p23,
>
> p11, p12, p13 depend on p1, but not
)
Hope it makes sense,
Boni
-Original Message-
From: Gary Feldman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Donnerstag, 20. Juli 2006 15:13
To: Bonio Lopez
Cc: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] Feature request
Bonio Lopez wrote:
>
Evans, Jonathan (2) wrote:
> There are definitely cases where having compiled a couple of base projects
> the dependency tree then starts separating off into unrelated branches. And
> having compiled one dll it is immediatly possible to start testing or
> documenting it whilst the build process
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gary
Feldman
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 3:13 PM
To: Bonio Lopez
Cc: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] Feature request
Bonio Lopez wrote:
> Hi,
> Meanwhile quite any machine has more then one pro
Bonio Lopez wrote:
> Hi,
> Meanwhile quite any machine has more then one processor (even Intel with
> Dual Core and HT).
> Would not it be nice to add multithreading to nant? As starting point I
> could imagine to add some attribute to task, like
>
>
>
That's EXACTLY what I am after - brilliant. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Troy Laurin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 February 2005 14:27
To: Chris Fewtrell
Cc: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Feature Request: Failed/success property
Chris Few
Chris Fewtrell wrote:
Hi
In build scripts, often I want to carry on executing the script even
though the last task has failed (ie. use failonerror="false") but I
would like to know that the preceeding step has failed so I can do some
different processing to normal.
What do you think of the
As usual -- patches welcome. The ant-contrib ( not NAnt-contrib ) has a
ccTask that would be a good candidate for porting:
http://ant-contrib.sourceforge.net/cc.html
of course there is nothing stopping you from using to call out to
makefiles for the c/c++ parts and having a 'mixed' build for no
10 matches
Mail list logo
