Thanks Erich, looks like a good time for a wrapper class!
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:22:09 +0200From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [NAnt-users] Advanced NANT question ...
Hi Alan,
Thought I'd mention it:
When using ExecuteAssembly(), the ass
.
-Erich
From: Alan Guedeney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 2007-10-26 15:41
To: Gert Driesen
Cc: Alan Guedeney; Erich Eichinger; nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] Advanced NANT question ...
Thanks Gert, I'll try that out.I'm sure it will
see a way to retrieve the standard out or
standard error from the program. What a pain!
These Microsoft .NET made this much too complicated un-necessarily. They
really don't believe in simplification. I guess that goes
against job-security! LOL
Subject: RE: [NAnt-users] Advanced NANT question
. What a pain!
These Microsoft .NET made this much too complicated un-necessarily. They
really don't believe in simplification. I guess that goes against
job-security! LOL
Subject: RE: [NAnt-users] Advanced NANT question ...
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 08:14:29 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTE
try
AppDomain.ExecuteAssembly("nant.exe",
Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().Evidence, new string[] { "targetname" } );
-Erich
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan
Guedeney
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 4:3
