RE: [Nant-users] stable release for version 0.85

2004-09-24 Thread Daniel Nguyen
+2! :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thibaut Barrère Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 10:11 AM To: Merrill Cornish Cc: Gert Driesen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Nant-users] stable release for version 0.85 +1! this release deserve

Re: [Nant-users] stable release for version 0.85

2004-09-24 Thread Thibaut Barrère
+1! this release deserve *at least* 0.90 Thibaut On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:51:45 -0500 (GMT-05:00), Merrill Cornish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gert, > > Considering the wide range of new functionality in upcoming release, perhaps it > should be call 0.90 rather than 0.84, since it's a _lot_ more

Re: [Nant-users] stable release for version 0.85

2004-09-24 Thread Merrill Cornish
Gert, Considering the wide range of new functionality in upcoming release, perhaps it should be call 0.90 rather than 0.84, since it's a _lot_ more than 1% better than what it will be replacing. :-) Merrill --- This SF.Net email is sponsore

Re: [Nant-users] stable release for version 0.85

2004-09-24 Thread Gert Driesen
Hoi Rutger, We are close to a new release, but there's still a few things left to do. Currently, I'm very busy preparing a presentation, and fixing/reporting Mono bugs ... I hope to have more time in about two weeks, and I hope to start the next beta cycle within two weeks after that (so the 0.85