rge.netCc: Alan WallaceBetreff: RE: [Nant-users] nUnit2 task:
Remove from project
I can see the point
behind this, and to an extent I agree: if a feature is broken and there's no
intention of fixing it then it should simply be removed, because otherwise
people (like me - see my earlie
> I can see the point behind this, and to an extent I agree: if a feature is
broken and there's no intention of fixing it then it
> should simply be removed, because otherwise people (like me - see my
earlier post) are going to waste a lot of time trying to
> get something to work that just won't
sers@lists.sourceforge.netCc:
Alan WallaceSubject: RE: [Nant-users] nUnit2 task: Remove from
project
I can see the point
behind this, and to an extent I agree: if a feature is broken and there’s no
intention of fixing it then it should simply be removed, because otherwise
people (lik
I can see the point behind this, and to an
extent I agree: if a feature is broken and there’s no intention of fixing
it then it should simply be removed, because otherwise people (like me –
see my earlier post) are going to waste a lot of time trying to get something
to work that just won’t
