Stephen Tunney wrote:
I'm not sure. All I know is that there is no other method that works. And this "may" be
a bug, but the "test" attribute is required. So placing true in there is the only way to
get around it. LOOPHOLE :)
Have you tried Robert's first syntax, i.e. test="${not
pro
MAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Schneider
Sent: November 2, 2005 1:13 AM
To: Nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Nant-users] convert::to-int deprecated
Is this the regular approach?:
>
> //TODO: Stuff
>
>
> Kind of hoaky, but it works :)
Why not
On 11/2/05, Robert Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this the regular approach?:
>
> >
> > //TODO: Stuff
> >
> >
> > Kind of hoaky, but it works :)
>
> Why not:
>
>
>//TODO: Stuff
>
Typo aside, putting the actual positive test in the test attribute is
much more expressive (at leas
Is this the regular approach?:
>
> //TODO: Stuff
>
>
> Kind of hoaky, but it works :)
Why not:
//TODO: Stuff
or
//TODO: Stuff
?
Cheers,
Robert
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development chall
Not sure about the first question, but as for ifnot, replace
with the following:
buildtarget ')}">
//TODO:
Stuff
Kind of hoaky, but it works :)
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Cowan
Sent: November 1, 2005 6:08 AM
To:
N
Actually, for the first part of your question, check out
${int::parse(value)}
Looks like the functions are attempting to take on a more
.NET look :) Considering you should never use the Convert static methods
unless you ABSOLUTELY have to because they are inefficient.
Steve
