Re: [Nant-users] Trying to abstract the section.

2005-04-20 Thread Troy Laurin
What may be cleaner than directly writing the child build scripts using the task is to use XML/XSLT to template your build scripts... http://nant.sourceforge.net/release/latest/help/tasks/style.html It would probably yield a more maintainable script in the long run, since XSLT should be much simp

Re: [Nant-users] Trying to abstract the section.

2005-04-20 Thread Ashley Moran
Selke, Anthony wrote: Ouch. I really hoped to avoid building the file from scratch (hence the tag). What about the node? I have the following: Actually I've just done a similar thing- dynamically generating a nant script (although mine was for customised remote application installs. What you

RE: [Nant-users] Trying to abstract the section.

2005-04-19 Thread Selke, Anthony
> Does CI mean "check in " or "continuous integration"? Sorry ... continuous integration, though I am doing my testing running Nant directly from the command line. > NAnt only deals with the if/unless/ifnot control > facilities at the task level. Ouch. I really hoped to avoid building the file

Re: [Nant-users] Trying to abstract the section.

2005-04-19 Thread Gary Feldman
Selke, Anthony wrote: I am putting together a CI build process and trying to do so in such a way that it is as simple as possible to add new projects. Does CI mean "check in " or "continuous integration" (not that it's really relevant to the question)? All of our projects are done in Visual Stud