> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ian MacLean
> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 09:29
> To: Gert Driesen
> Cc: 'Troy Laurin'; 'J. Christopher Six';
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Nant-user
Gert Driesen wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ian MacLean
Sent: vrijdag 3 december 2004 9:29
To: Gert Driesen
Cc: 'Troy Laurin'; 'J. Christopher Six';
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Re: Segfaul
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Ian MacLean
> Sent: vrijdag 3 december 2004 9:29
> To: Gert Driesen
> Cc: 'Troy Laurin'; 'J. Christopher Six';
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: R
Gert Driesen wrote:
This is a legacy of Ant not having expressions or an if
statement, so
the only way to conditionally perform tasks was via this depends/if
mechanism:
Since NAnt now does have expressions then that behaviour
doesn't make as
much sense. You can achi
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Ian MacLean
> Sent: vrijdag 3 december 2004 3:58
> To: Troy Laurin
> Cc: J. Christopher Six; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Re: Segfault during compilati
Troy Laurin wrote:
J. Christopher Six wrote:
The "if" attribute definitely seems to be malfunctioning. Here is my
test build:
The results of running this on Gentoo:
$nant test.build
<...snipped irrelevant messages...
Ah, thanks for the clarification. I'm new to NAnt and I just now
discovered its task, something Ant has desperately needed. Kudos
to the NAnt team for avoiding Ant's shortcomings here.
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 00:24:11 +0800, Troy Laurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This isn't a malfunction, at least
J. Christopher Six wrote:
The "if" attribute definitely seems to be malfunctioning. Here is my test build:
The results of running this on Gentoo:
$nant test.build
<...snipped irrelevant messages...>
Target(s) specif
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 23:44:08 +0900, Ian MacLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> well - you'll find that its missing all the descriptions that are
> written as xml doc comments in the c# source. So it works -- its just
> not that useful yet.
>
> Ian
There doesn't appear to be anything missing in the
J. Christopher Six wrote:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 06:07:08 +0100, Gert Driesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually NDoc should work just fine, even if no xmldoc is available.
It does indeed. I checked the contents of /usr/share/NAnt/doc and the
generated SDK docs look fine, as do the docs in the
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 06:07:08 +0100, Gert Driesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually NDoc should work just fine, even if no xmldoc is available.
It does indeed. I checked the contents of /usr/share/NAnt/doc and the
generated SDK docs look fine, as do the docs in the "help" subdir. At
least that ~
I neglected to add that when I remove the if="${platform::is-win32()}"
attribute from the "test" target, I see this as well:
test:
[echo] Is Win32: False
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid rev
The "if" attribute definitely seems to be malfunctioning. Here is my test build:
The results of running this on Gentoo:
$nant test.build
<...snipped irrelevant messages...>
Target(s) specified: test
depen
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: donderdag 2 december 2004 6:31
> To: Gert Driesen
> Cc: 'Nik Derewianka'; 'Nant-Users (E-mail)'
> Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Re: Segfault during compilation
> w
Gert Driesen wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ian MacLean
Sent: donderdag 2 december 2004 6:03
To: Nik Derewianka
Cc: Nant-Users (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Re: Segfault during compilation
with mono on Linux
Nik
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Ian MacLean
> Sent: donderdag 2 december 2004 6:03
> To: Nik Derewianka
> Cc: Nant-Users (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Re: Segfault during compilation
>
Nik Derewianka wrote:
Ian MacLean wrote:
The reason we skip it on linux is because mcs does not support the
/doc argument which generates the xml used by ndoc. However a patch
for this will soon be applied to mono svn so we'll build it then.
So i was a bit premature in my success declarations wi
J. Christopher Six wrote:
I bypassed use of the Makefile and was able to successfully build nant
by directly issuing:
mono bin/NAnt.exe -f:NAnt.build build
Curiously, this is identical to the command that is invoked by running
"make" under a non-WinNT environment.
I'm still uncertain why it was
18 matches
Mail list logo
