Re: [NAnt-users] Mail Logger

2006-11-28 Thread Gert Driesen
Gert > -Original Message- > From: Michael Jervis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: dinsdag 28 november 2006 17:39 > To: Gert Driesen > Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] Mail Logger > > > The conditional compilation directive (#if NET_1_1) was fine, it was > a bug > > in the

Re: [NAnt-users] Mail Logger

2006-11-28 Thread Gert Driesen
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nant-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Jervis > Sent: dinsdag 28 november 2006 17:16 > To: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] Mail Logger > > Also, you mus

Re: [NAnt-users] Mail Logger

2006-11-28 Thread Michael Jervis
Also, you must set sendusing to 2 for authentication to work at all, and the if clause for the smtpPassword is reversed. My current hacked version is lacking the faulty #if's, but at least sends email...: string smtpUsername = GetPropertyValue(properties, "smtp.username", null, false);

Re: [NAnt-users] Mail Logger

2006-11-28 Thread Michael Jervis
Ask a stupid question, find an answer... #if (NET_1_1) mailMessage.Fields[cdoNamespaceURI + "smtpauthenticate"] = 1; mailMessage.Fields[cdoNamespaceURI + "sendusername"] = smtpUsername; #else Console.Error.WriteLine("[MailLogger] MailLogg

RE: [Nant-users] Mail Logger

2005-05-28 Thread Gert Driesen
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Merrill Cornish > Sent: vrijdag 27 mei 2005 21:02 > To: Evan Levy; Gert Driesen; Paul Cowan; > nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: RE: [Nant-users] Mail Logger &

RE: [Nant-users] Mail Logger

2005-05-27 Thread Gert Driesen
iesen; Paul Cowan; nant-users@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: RE: [Nant-users] Mail Logger ... and setting files on the command line is not necessary in my case.   And thanks for the quick response!   e From: Evan Levy Sent: May 27, 2005 2:40 PMTo: 'Gert Driesen

RE: [Nant-users] Mail Logger

2005-05-27 Thread Merrill Cornish
Evan, >>> there might be a need to attach one file on success, and another on failure, >>> but I'm not sure what that would be. One common usage would be to attach files on failure to help diagnois the failure, but not attach anything on success. Merrill --

RE: [Nant-users] Mail Logger

2005-05-27 Thread Evan Levy
... and setting files on the command line is not necessary in my case.   And thanks for the quick response!   e From: Evan Levy Sent: May 27, 2005 2:40 PMTo: 'Gert Driesen'; 'Paul Cowan'; nant-users@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: RE: [Nant-users] Mail Logger In my case

RE: [Nant-users] Mail Logger

2005-05-27 Thread Evan Levy
2005 2:34 PMTo: Evan Levy; 'Paul Cowan'; nant-users@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: RE: [Nant-users] Mail Logger Hi Paul, Evan,   We could add a MailLogger.attachments property that takes an identifier of a defined fileset.   You could then have something like this

RE: [Nant-users] Mail Logger

2005-05-27 Thread Gert Driesen
-users@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: RE: [Nant-users] Mail Logger I'm also looking for this feature.  I would like to attach the results of FxCop.   Perhaps someone could take a stab at a MailLogger.attachfiles property? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROT

RE: [Nant-users] Mail Logger

2005-05-27 Thread Evan Levy
I'm also looking for this feature.  I would like to attach the results of FxCop.   Perhaps someone could take a stab at a MailLogger.attachfiles property? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul CowanSent: May 25, 2005 5:48 AMTo: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.ne