> If you're going to do this, would it also be possible to have
> as well as .
A switch or choose structure is much cleaner (IMHO) for this kind of
pattern in xml.
elseif works well in code, but tends to cause indentation blowout in
xml:
Disclaimer Message:
y; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Conditional arguments in
>
> +1 to either of the ideas. Having an else is a must.
>
> I wonder if it would be doable to have:
>
>
>
> 'then' tasks here
>
>
>
> 'else' tas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 3:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Conditional arguments in
> Gary,
>
> The choose pattern is something I had in mind myself, so we might wanna
add
> this to the release plan for NAnt 0.8x (or 0.9), after a
IL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 3:05 PM
Subject: RE: [Nant-users] Conditional arguments in
On this note, let me throw in a wishlist item: I wish nant supported an
if/else structure! Perhaps something like this:
Or perhaps follow the xslt choose pattern?
Or perha
, July 28, 2004 11:07 PM
To: John Ludlow; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Nant-users] Conditional arguments in
John, to reply to your email in reverse order... (most relevant first)
> Any ideas?
Currently, the only way (AFAIK) to do what you want is to duplicate the
exec task and surround it w
John, to reply to your email in reverse order... (most relevant first)
> Any ideas?
Currently, the only way (AFAIK) to do what you want is to duplicate the
exec task and surround it with guarding if/ifnot statements:
> I tried this (just on an off-chance):
>
>
>
