Eric Deslauriers wrote:
What I need to do with the above snippet is change test’s failonerror to
TRUE when not doing code coverage, but to FALSE when doing codecoverage,
then pass the fail back to codecov to propogate out. Basically like
catching and rethrowing an exception.
Thanks!,
Eric
Eric
John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 04:40, Troy Laurin wrote:
The cleanest solution (IMHO) was to create a custom try/catch/finally
task... your codecov target becomes:
GACK!
Where is this documented? Is this part of the standard syntax for all
targets?
-
> - Original Message -
> From: "Troy Laurin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "John Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "NAnt Users mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 3:20 PM
> Subject: Re: [
Troy,
Thanks for the head's up. As soon as we move to 0.85, I'll plunk that
in. It is a great solution.
Eric D
> The cleanest solution (IMHO) was to create a custom try/catch/finally
> task... your codecov target becomes:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The tr
Eric,
Properties are immutable ONLY if their readonly attribute has been set to true.
Properties which are created by virtue of being -D: command line arguments are
automatically readonly. However, properties that YOU create are readonly ONLY
if you override the default of read/write and set
