Thibaut Barrère wrote:
...
We have some third party library (namely, Syncfusion Essential Suite)
which is massively used in our components (here the CCNet+NAnt setup
drives 60+ solutions). A new release came out with a change in the
licensing strategy (the content of the .licx file had to be
Martin Gainty wrote:
Good Morning/Bonjour
I would like to ask Gary if there any version of make has capability
to handle building a solution such as the Nant Task solution
keeping in mind that the solution task handles all permutations of
environment development, uat, qa, release as well as
Barrère
To: Gary Feldman
Cc: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 8:57
AM
Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Build target
from command line without dependencies
While
I see many advantages (and disadvantages) in NAnt, I can't thinkof
anythin
While I see many advantages (and disadvantages) in NAnt, I can't thinkof anything off the top of my head that it can do, but that can't be
done with ordinary make/bash (or other scripting language). NAntbenefits from having a centralized repository of tasks, so that we don'teach have to build our
Anderson, Kelly wrote:
If you mean "keeping a copy of the results of a build" ...
If you mean "keeping a copy of the source that went into a build" ...
If you mean "mirroring a file tree to a second location" ...
Yeah, that's a good example of what I'm talking about...
Well, yes, NAnt
> If you mean "keeping a copy of the results of a build" ...
> If you mean "keeping a copy of the source that went into a build" ...
> If you mean "mirroring a file tree to a second location" ...
Yeah, that's a good example of what I'm talking about...
I bet we could come up with a pile of exampl
Kelly Anderson wrote:
> Why wouldn't you use NAnt to do backups?
For what it's worth ... And depending on what kind of backup you mean
... I do.
If you mean "keeping a copy of the results of a build" ...
... In all my software build scripts, I have a "release" target that
does the whole build
>Why wouldn't you use NAnt to do backups?
Is that database backups?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anderson,
Kelly
Sent: 21 September 2005 16:59
To: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Nant-users] Build target from comm
> >and I'm wondering why the "marketing department" isn't
> making more hay
> >out of the other things NAnt could do.
>
> While I see many advantages (and disadvantages) in NAnt, I
> can't think
> of anything off the top of my head that it can do, but that can't be
> done with ordinary make/bas
Anderson, Kelly wrote:
I didn't so much have a question, as an observation. I do see MANY clear
advantages of NAnt over make and shell scripts as you do. My only issue
was just with how it's being presented. It seems that NAnt would be very
good at solving a lot of problems that make would have
> Thank you for a pleasant discussion of NAnt. I'm quite excited to be
> using it and learning about it. I hope that someday soon, I'll be able
> to answer questions here rather than just asking. I've really enjoyed
> the separation of concerns thread too. Nice thinking!
>
> -Kelly
Nothing wrong
t; Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 12:13 PM
> To: Anderson, Kelly
> Subject: RE: [Nant-users] Build target from command line
> without dependencies
>
> Hello again Kelly,
>
> You wrote:
> Having your build scripts be cross platform may be important to Java
> people,
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anderson,
Kelly
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 1:49 PM
To: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Nant-users] Build target from command line without
dependencies
This is NOT a NAnt bash. I am NOT complaining. I am trying to gain
insight into NAnt.
All
I didn't so much have a question, as an observation. I do see MANY clear
advantages of NAnt over make and shell scripts as you do. My only issue
was just with how it's being presented. It seems that NAnt would be very
good at solving a lot of problems that make would have difficulty
solving. I gues
ag like would either validate
against the schema, or not.
I hope this helps to answer your question.
Regards,
Richard
-Original Message-
From: Anderson, Kelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 16:47
To: Foster, Richard - PAL
Subject: RE: [Nant-users] Build
Kelly Anderson wrote:
> All of the "marketing" for NAnt seems to indicate that it is a
> replacement for make.
> ...
> Sure, you CAN write a make system with a shell script, but the beauty
of
> make was that the dependency checking was implicit and built in. It
> seems with NAnt that you have to
On 9/15/05, Bill Arnette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With my suggestion, 'nant -only:projectC' would only do the body of the
> projectC target and not execute the dependencies without cluttering the
> build file with dependency-only targets, or with if statements and unless
> attributes that short
-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Build target from command line without
dependencies
Bill Arnette wrote:
>
>I asked a similar question a while ago and never got a response.
>Basically my question was what is the Nant equivalent of a C++
makefile?
>
>
>
Bill Arnette wrote:
I asked a similar question a while ago and never got a response. Basically
my question was what is the Nant equivalent of a C++ makefile?
There is no answer to that, because there's no such thing as a canonical
C++ makefile. Perhaps you have in mind the NMake files th
ng
marketed as if it were something that it isn't really... comments?
-Kelly
-Original Message-
From: Foster, Richard - PAL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 10:21 AM
To: Anderson, Kelly
Subject: RE: [Nant-users] Build target from command line without
depe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anderson, Kelly
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 12:04 PM
To: Bill Arnette; nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Nant-users] Build target from command line without
dependencies
Bill
Bill,
Wouldn't your approach invoke:
even if libZ were up to date? Is this a bad thing? It seems so
from an efficiency standpoint. In comparison to make, it seems to me
that most NAnt scripts I've seen seem to do more work than the makefile
even though it is expressed much mo
-Original Message-
From: Owen Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 8:25 PM
To: Arnette, Bill
Cc: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Build target from command line without
dependencies
On 14/09/05, Arnette, Bill <[EMAIL PROTEC
On 14/09/05, Arnette, Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When writing a build file that does everything from checking out the
> source to creating the installation package, it would be nice if you
> could run a target from the command line without running the
> dependencies. Is this possible now?
Bill Arnette wrote:
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edmund Schweppe
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 1:54 PM
Arnette, Bill wrote:
When writing a build file that does everything from checking out the
source to creating the installation package, it would be nice if you
could run a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edmund Schweppe
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 1:54 PM
To: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Build target from command line without
dependencies
Arnette, Bill wrote:
> W
Arnette, Bill wrote:
When writing a build file that does everything from checking out the
source to creating the installation package, it would be nice if you
could run a target from the command line without running the
dependencies. Is this possible now?
If you really need this ability - w
27 matches
Mail list logo
