RE: [Nant-users] stable release for version 0.85

2004-09-24 Thread Daniel Nguyen
+2! :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thibaut Barrère Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 10:11 AM To: Merrill Cornish Cc: Gert Driesen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Nant-users] stable release for version 0.85 +1! this release deserve

Re: [Nant-users] stable release for version 0.85

2004-09-24 Thread Thibaut Barrère
+1! this release deserve *at least* 0.90 Thibaut On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:51:45 -0500 (GMT-05:00), Merrill Cornish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gert, > > Considering the wide range of new functionality in upcoming release, perhaps it > should be call 0.90 rather than 0.84, since it's a _lot_ more

Re: [Nant-users] stable release for version 0.85

2004-09-24 Thread Merrill Cornish
Gert, Considering the wide range of new functionality in upcoming release, perhaps it should be call 0.90 rather than 0.84, since it's a _lot_ more than 1% better than what it will be replacing. :-) Merrill --- This SF.Net email is sponsore

Re: [Nant-users] stable release for version 0.85

2004-09-24 Thread Gert Driesen
jkstra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 4:19 PM Subject: [Nant-users] stable release for version 0.85 > Could someone from the development team tell us when we may expect a > 'stable release' of version 0.85 > > The

[Nant-users] stable release for version 0.85

2004-09-24 Thread Rutger Dijkstra
Could someone from the development team tell us when we may expect a 'stable release' of version 0.85 The latest stable version (0.84) is now almost a year old and tons of useful stuff has been added since. Though I do not mind working with a nightly build privately, I need an 'official' version