On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 19:54 +0800, Troy Laurin wrote:
> The normal way (AFAIK) to achieve this is to have your target 'C'
> depend on _both_ targets, and then use conditionals on those targets
> to determine which is supposed to run. To rearrange your example
> above:
>
>
>
>
>
Ah, this is e
On 7/2/05, Stephen Touset <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to have a depends clause in a target that uses a
> property? In other words,
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Whenever I do this, any attempt to build results in an error saying the
> property ${target} had not been set. However, it's set to
Is it possible to have a depends clause in a target that uses a
property? In other words,
Whenever I do this, any attempt to build results in an error saying the
property ${target} had not been set. However, it's set to a default in
the top level of the build file (other targets change it).
