--- Damir Simunic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since there is so much interest in this msbuild thing, here's the list of
> namespaces Microsoft.Build.BuildEngine
The book they handed out with the PDC alpha bits, "Introducing Longhorn for
Developers", Brent Rector, Microsoft Press, has a fairly un
Since there is so much interest in this msbuild thing, here's the list of
namespaces Microsoft.Build.BuildEngine
When you open the link, click on 'sync toc' to see the rest of
Microsoft.Build.* namespaces in the TOC.
http://longhorn.msdn.microsoft.com/?//longhorn.msdn.microsoft.com/lhsdk/ref/
mic
Will be great if NANT include the flag -msi
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jaroslaw
Kowalski
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 2:48 PM
To: Tom Cabanski; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Nant-users] Re: [nant-dev] FYI
Sounds
al Message -
From: "Jaroslaw Kowalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Re: [nant-dev] FYI
> Do they have 's and 's, loops and sub-builds ?
>
> Jarek
> - Original Message
Do they have 's and 's, loops and sub-builds ?
Jarek
- Original Message -
From: "Brant Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003
I am at PDC and attended the session last night. The MSBuild is basically
NAnt with the following differences.
[1] Now the Visual Studio project file is the "build" file. This allows for
much tighter integration between VS and the build tool. In fact VS now
"shells" out to the build tool dir
Sounds like they've invented ant ;-) For some interesting comments, see:
http://blogs.gotdotnet.com/korbyp/commentview.aspx/c6c8775e-74b3-4d9c-971b-615f744cc1e5
Do you think that NAnt should be changed to support MSBuild's XML format in
the future?
Or even abandon current format to promote compat
